tommath/bn_mp_prime_strong_lucas_se...

358 lines
12 KiB
C

#include "tommath_private.h"
#ifdef BN_MP_PRIME_STRONG_LUCAS_SELFRIDGE_C
/* LibTomMath, multiple-precision integer library -- Tom St Denis
*
* LibTomMath is a library that provides multiple-precision
* integer arithmetic as well as number theoretic functionality.
*
* The library was designed directly after the MPI library by
* Michael Fromberger but has been written from scratch with
* additional optimizations in place.
*
* The library is free for all purposes without any express
* guarantee it works.
*/
#ifndef MP_8BIT
/*
Strong Lucas-Selfridge test.
returns MP_YES if it is a strong L-S prime, MP_NO if it is composite
Code ported from Thomas Ray Nicely's implementation of the BPSW test
at http://www.trnicely.net/misc/bpsw.html
Freeware copyright (C) 2016 Thomas R. Nicely <http://www.trnicely.net>.
Released into the public domain by the author, who disclaims any legal
liability arising from its use
The multi-line comments are made by Thomas R. Nicely and are copied verbatim.
Single-line comments are by the code-portist.
(If that name sounds familiar, he is the guy who found the fdiv bug in the
Pentium (P5x, I think) Intel processor)
*/
int mp_prime_strong_lucas_selfridge(const mp_int *a, int *result)
{
// TODO: choose better variable names! "Dz" and "dz"? Really?
mp_int Dz, gcd, Np1, dz, Uz, Vz, U2mz, V2mz, Qmz, Q2mz, Qkdz, T1z, T2z, T3z, T4z, Q2kdz;
// TODO: Some of them need the full 32 bit, hence the (temporary) exclusion of MP_8BIT
int32_t D, Ds, J, sign, P, Q, r, s, u, Nbits;
int e = MP_OKAY;
int isset;
*result = MP_NO;
/*
Find the first element D in the sequence {5, -7, 9, -11, 13, ...}
such that Jacobi(D,N) = -1 (Selfridge's algorithm). Theory
indicates that, if N is not a perfect square, D will "nearly
always" be "small." Just in case, an overflow trap for D is
included.
*/
D = 5;
sign = 1;
if ((e = mp_init_multi(&Dz, &gcd, &Np1, &dz, &Uz, &Vz, &U2mz, &V2mz, &Qmz, &Q2mz, &Qkdz, &T1z, &T2z, &T3z, &T4z, &Q2kdz,
NULL)) != MP_OKAY) {
return e;
}
for (;;) {
Ds = sign * D;
sign = -sign;
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Dz,(unsigned long) D)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_gcd(a, &Dz, &gcd)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* if 1 < GCD < N then N is composite with factor "D", and
Jacobi(D,N) is technically undefined (but often returned
as zero). */
if ((gcd.used > 1 || gcd.dp[0] > 1) && mp_cmp(&gcd,a) == MP_LT) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_kronecker(&Dz, a, &J)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (J < 0) {
break;
}
D += 2;
if (D > INT_MAX - 2) {
e = MP_VAL;
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
P = 1; /* Selfridge's choice */
Q = (1 - Ds) / 4; /* Required so D = P*P - 4*Q */
/* NOTE: The conditions (a) N does not divide Q, and
(b) D is square-free or not a perfect square, are included by
some authors; e.g., "Prime numbers and computer methods for
factorization," Hans Riesel (2nd ed., 1994, Birkhauser, Boston),
p. 130. For this particular application of Lucas sequences,
these conditions were found to be immaterial. */
/* Now calculate N - Jacobi(D,N) = N + 1 (even), and calculate the
odd positive integer d and positive integer s for which
N + 1 = 2^s*d (similar to the step for N - 1 in Miller's test).
The strong Lucas-Selfridge test then returns N as a strong
Lucas probable prime (slprp) if any of the following
conditions is met: U_d=0, V_d=0, V_2d=0, V_4d=0, V_8d=0,
V_16d=0, ..., etc., ending with V_{2^(s-1)*d}=V_{(N+1)/2}=0
(all equalities mod N). Thus d is the highest index of U that
must be computed (since V_2m is independent of U), compared
to U_{N+1} for the standard Lucas-Selfridge test; and no
index of V beyond (N+1)/2 is required, just as in the
standard Lucas-Selfridge test. However, the quantity Q^d must
be computed for use (if necessary) in the latter stages of
the test. The result is that the strong Lucas-Selfridge test
has a running time only slightly greater (order of 10 %) than
that of the standard Lucas-Selfridge test, while producing
only (roughly) 30 % as many pseudoprimes (and every strong
Lucas pseudoprime is also a standard Lucas pseudoprime). Thus
the evidence indicates that the strong Lucas-Selfridge test is
more effective than the standard Lucas-Selfridge test, and a
Baillie-PSW test based on the strong Lucas-Selfridge test
should be more reliable. */
if ((e = mp_add_d(a,1,&Np1)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
s = mp_cnt_lsb(&Np1);
// this should round towards zero because
// Thomas R. Nicely used GMP's mpz_tdiv_q_2exp()
// mp_div_2d() does that
if ((e = mp_div_2d(&Np1, s, &dz, NULL)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* We must now compute U_d and V_d. Since d is odd, the accumulated
values U and V are initialized to U_1 and V_1 (if the target
index were even, U and V would be initialized instead to U_0=0
and V_0=2). The values of U_2m and V_2m are also initialized to
U_1 and V_1; the FOR loop calculates in succession U_2 and V_2,
U_4 and V_4, U_8 and V_8, etc. If the corresponding bits
(1, 2, 3, ...) of t are on (the zero bit having been accounted
for in the initialization of U and V), these values are then
combined with the previous totals for U and V, using the
composition formulas for addition of indices. */
mp_set(&Uz, 1u); /* U=U_1 */
mp_set(&Vz, (mp_digit)P); /* V=V_1 */
mp_set(&U2mz, 1u); /* U_1 */
mp_set(&V2mz, (mp_digit)P); /* V_1 */
if (Q < 0) {
Q = -Q;
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Qmz, (unsigned long) Q)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
Qmz.sign = MP_NEG;
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Q2mz, (unsigned long)(2 * Q))) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
Q2mz.sign = MP_NEG;
/* Initializes calculation of Q^d */
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Qkdz, (unsigned long) Q)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
Qkdz.sign = MP_NEG;
Q = -Q;
} else {
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Qmz, (unsigned long) Q)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Q2mz, (unsigned long)(2 * Q))) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* Initializes calculation of Q^d */
if ((e = mp_set_int(&Qkdz, (unsigned long) Q)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
Nbits = mp_count_bits(&dz);
for (u = 1; u < Nbits; u++) { /* zero bit off, already accounted for */
/* Formulas for doubling of indices (carried out mod N). Note that
* the indices denoted as "2m" are actually powers of 2, specifically
* 2^(ul-1) beginning each loop and 2^ul ending each loop.
*
* U_2m = U_m*V_m
* V_2m = V_m*V_m - 2*Q^m
*/
if ((e = mp_mul(&U2mz,&V2mz,&U2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&U2mz,a,&U2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_sqr(&V2mz,&V2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_sub(&V2mz,&Q2mz,&V2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&V2mz,a,&V2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* Must calculate powers of Q for use in V_2m, also for Q^d later */
if ((e = mp_sqr(&Qmz,&Qmz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* prevents overflow */ // still necessary without a fixed prealloc'd mem.?
if ((e = mp_mod(&Qmz,a,&Qmz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul_2(&Qmz,&Q2mz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((isset = mp_get_bit(&dz,u)) == MP_VAL) {
e = isset;
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (isset == MP_YES) {
/* Formulas for addition of indices (carried out mod N);
*
* U_(m+n) = (U_m*V_n + U_n*V_m)/2
* V_(m+n) = (V_m*V_n + D*U_m*U_n)/2
*
* Be careful with division by 2 (mod N)!
*/
if ((e = mp_mul(&U2mz,&Vz,&T1z)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul(&Uz,&V2mz,&T2z)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul(&V2mz,&Vz,&T3z)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul(&U2mz,&Uz,&T4z)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul_si(&T4z,(long)Ds,&T4z)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_add(&T1z,&T2z,&Uz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (mp_isodd(&Uz)) {
if ((e = mp_add(&Uz,a,&Uz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
// This should round towards negative infinity because
// Thomas R. Nicely used GMP's mpz_fdiv_q_2exp().
// But mp_div_2() does not do so, it is truncating instead.
if ((e = mp_div_2(&Uz,&Uz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (Uz.sign == MP_NEG && mp_isodd(&Uz)) {
if ((e = mp_sub_d(&Uz,1,&Uz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
if ((e = mp_add(&T3z,&T4z,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (mp_isodd(&Vz)) {
if ((e = mp_add(&Vz,a,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
if ((e = mp_div_2(&Vz,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (Vz.sign == MP_NEG) {
if ((e = mp_sub_d(&Vz,1,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&Uz,a,&Uz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&Vz,a,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* Calculating Q^d for later use */
if ((e = mp_mul(&Qkdz,&Qmz,&Qkdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&Qkdz,a,&Qkdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
}
/* If U_d or V_d is congruent to 0 mod N, then N is a prime or a
strong Lucas pseudoprime. */
if (mp_iszero(&Uz) || mp_iszero(&Vz)) {
*result = MP_YES;
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* NOTE: Ribenboim ("The new book of prime number records," 3rd ed.,
1995/6) omits the condition V0 on p.142, but includes it on
p. 130. The condition is NECESSARY; otherwise the test will
return false negatives---e.g., the primes 29 and 2000029 will be
returned as composite. */
/* Otherwise, we must compute V_2d, V_4d, V_8d, ..., V_{2^(s-1)*d}
by repeated use of the formula V_2m = V_m*V_m - 2*Q^m. If any of
these are congruent to 0 mod N, then N is a prime or a strong
Lucas pseudoprime. */
/* Initialize 2*Q^(d*2^r) for V_2m */
if ((e = mp_mul_2(&Qkdz,&Q2kdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
for (r = 1; r < s; r++) {
if ((e = mp_sqr(&Vz,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_sub(&Vz,&Q2kdz,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&Vz,a,&Vz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if (mp_iszero(&Vz)) {
*result = MP_YES;
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
/* Calculate Q^{d*2^r} for next r (final iteration irrelevant). */
if (r < s - 1) {
if ((e = mp_sqr(&Qkdz,&Qkdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mod(&Qkdz,a,&Qkdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
if ((e = mp_mul_2(&Qkdz,&Q2kdz)) != MP_OKAY) {
goto LBL_LS_ERR;
}
}
}
LBL_LS_ERR:
mp_clear_multi(&Dz, &gcd, &Np1, &Uz, &Vz, &U2mz, &V2mz, &Qmz, &Q2mz, &Qkdz, &T1z, &T2z, &T3z, &T4z, &Q2kdz, NULL);
return e;
}
#endif
#endif