android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8350/include/linux/mmc/card.h

108 lines
3.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* linux/include/linux/mmc/card.h
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* Card driver specific definitions.
*/
#ifndef LINUX_MMC_CARD_H
#define LINUX_MMC_CARD_H
#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
struct mmc_cid {
unsigned int manfid;
char prod_name[8];
unsigned int serial;
unsigned short oemid;
unsigned short year;
unsigned char hwrev;
unsigned char fwrev;
unsigned char month;
};
struct mmc_csd {
unsigned char mmca_vsn;
unsigned short cmdclass;
unsigned short tacc_clks;
unsigned int tacc_ns;
unsigned int max_dtr;
unsigned int read_blkbits;
unsigned int capacity;
};
struct sd_scr {
unsigned char sda_vsn;
unsigned char bus_widths;
#define SD_SCR_BUS_WIDTH_1 (1<<0)
#define SD_SCR_BUS_WIDTH_4 (1<<2)
};
struct mmc_host;
/*
* MMC device
*/
struct mmc_card {
struct list_head node; /* node in hosts devices list */
struct mmc_host *host; /* the host this device belongs to */
struct device dev; /* the device */
unsigned int rca; /* relative card address of device */
unsigned int state; /* (our) card state */
#define MMC_STATE_PRESENT (1<<0) /* present in sysfs */
#define MMC_STATE_DEAD (1<<1) /* device no longer in stack */
#define MMC_STATE_BAD (1<<2) /* unrecognised device */
[PATCH] sd: initialize SD cards Support for the Secure Digital protocol in the MMC layer. A summary of the legal issues surrounding SD cards, as understood by yours truly: Members of the Secure Digital Association, hereafter SDA, are required to sign a NDA[1] before given access to any specifications. It has been speculated that including an SD implementation would forbid these members to redistribute Linux. This is the basic problem with SD support so it is unclear if it even is a problem since it has no effect on those of us that aren't members. The SDA doesn't seem to enforce these rules though since the patches included here are based on documentation made public by some of the members. The most complete specs[2] are actually released by Sandisk, one of the founding companies of the SDA. Because of this the NDA is considered a non-issue by most involved in the discussions concerning these patches. It might be that the SDA is only interested in protecting the so called "secure" bits of SD, which so far hasn't been found in any public spec. (The card is split into two sections, one "normal" and one "secure" which has an access scheme similar to TPM:s). (As a side note, Microsoft is working to make things easier for us since they want to be able to include the source code for a SD driver in one of their development kits. HP is making sure that the new NDA will allow a Linux implementation. So far only the SDIO specs have been opened up[3]. More will hopefully follow.) [1] http://www.sdcard.org/membership/images/ippolicy.pdf [2] http://www.sandisk.com/pdf/oem/ProdManualSDCardv1.9.pdf [3] http://www.sdcard.org/sdio/Simplified%20SDIO%20Card%20Specification.pdf This patch contains the central parts of the SD support. If no MMC cards are found on a bus then the MMC layer proceeds looking for SD cards. Helper functions are extended to handle the special needs of SD cards. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-06 18:18:50 -04:00
#define MMC_STATE_SDCARD (1<<3) /* is an SD card */
#define MMC_STATE_READONLY (1<<4) /* card is read-only */
u32 raw_cid[4]; /* raw card CID */
u32 raw_csd[4]; /* raw card CSD */
u32 raw_scr[2]; /* raw card SCR */
struct mmc_cid cid; /* card identification */
struct mmc_csd csd; /* card specific */
struct sd_scr scr; /* extra SD information */
};
#define mmc_card_present(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_PRESENT)
#define mmc_card_dead(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_DEAD)
#define mmc_card_bad(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_BAD)
[PATCH] sd: initialize SD cards Support for the Secure Digital protocol in the MMC layer. A summary of the legal issues surrounding SD cards, as understood by yours truly: Members of the Secure Digital Association, hereafter SDA, are required to sign a NDA[1] before given access to any specifications. It has been speculated that including an SD implementation would forbid these members to redistribute Linux. This is the basic problem with SD support so it is unclear if it even is a problem since it has no effect on those of us that aren't members. The SDA doesn't seem to enforce these rules though since the patches included here are based on documentation made public by some of the members. The most complete specs[2] are actually released by Sandisk, one of the founding companies of the SDA. Because of this the NDA is considered a non-issue by most involved in the discussions concerning these patches. It might be that the SDA is only interested in protecting the so called "secure" bits of SD, which so far hasn't been found in any public spec. (The card is split into two sections, one "normal" and one "secure" which has an access scheme similar to TPM:s). (As a side note, Microsoft is working to make things easier for us since they want to be able to include the source code for a SD driver in one of their development kits. HP is making sure that the new NDA will allow a Linux implementation. So far only the SDIO specs have been opened up[3]. More will hopefully follow.) [1] http://www.sdcard.org/membership/images/ippolicy.pdf [2] http://www.sandisk.com/pdf/oem/ProdManualSDCardv1.9.pdf [3] http://www.sdcard.org/sdio/Simplified%20SDIO%20Card%20Specification.pdf This patch contains the central parts of the SD support. If no MMC cards are found on a bus then the MMC layer proceeds looking for SD cards. Helper functions are extended to handle the special needs of SD cards. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-06 18:18:50 -04:00
#define mmc_card_sd(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_SDCARD)
#define mmc_card_readonly(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_READONLY)
#define mmc_card_set_present(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_PRESENT)
#define mmc_card_set_dead(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_DEAD)
#define mmc_card_set_bad(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_BAD)
[PATCH] sd: initialize SD cards Support for the Secure Digital protocol in the MMC layer. A summary of the legal issues surrounding SD cards, as understood by yours truly: Members of the Secure Digital Association, hereafter SDA, are required to sign a NDA[1] before given access to any specifications. It has been speculated that including an SD implementation would forbid these members to redistribute Linux. This is the basic problem with SD support so it is unclear if it even is a problem since it has no effect on those of us that aren't members. The SDA doesn't seem to enforce these rules though since the patches included here are based on documentation made public by some of the members. The most complete specs[2] are actually released by Sandisk, one of the founding companies of the SDA. Because of this the NDA is considered a non-issue by most involved in the discussions concerning these patches. It might be that the SDA is only interested in protecting the so called "secure" bits of SD, which so far hasn't been found in any public spec. (The card is split into two sections, one "normal" and one "secure" which has an access scheme similar to TPM:s). (As a side note, Microsoft is working to make things easier for us since they want to be able to include the source code for a SD driver in one of their development kits. HP is making sure that the new NDA will allow a Linux implementation. So far only the SDIO specs have been opened up[3]. More will hopefully follow.) [1] http://www.sdcard.org/membership/images/ippolicy.pdf [2] http://www.sandisk.com/pdf/oem/ProdManualSDCardv1.9.pdf [3] http://www.sdcard.org/sdio/Simplified%20SDIO%20Card%20Specification.pdf This patch contains the central parts of the SD support. If no MMC cards are found on a bus then the MMC layer proceeds looking for SD cards. Helper functions are extended to handle the special needs of SD cards. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-06 18:18:50 -04:00
#define mmc_card_set_sd(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_SDCARD)
#define mmc_card_set_readonly(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_READONLY)
#define mmc_card_name(c) ((c)->cid.prod_name)
#define mmc_card_id(c) ((c)->dev.bus_id)
#define mmc_list_to_card(l) container_of(l, struct mmc_card, node)
#define mmc_get_drvdata(c) dev_get_drvdata(&(c)->dev)
#define mmc_set_drvdata(c,d) dev_set_drvdata(&(c)->dev, d)
/*
* MMC device driver (e.g., Flash card, I/O card...)
*/
struct mmc_driver {
struct device_driver drv;
int (*probe)(struct mmc_card *);
void (*remove)(struct mmc_card *);
int (*suspend)(struct mmc_card *, pm_message_t);
int (*resume)(struct mmc_card *);
};
extern int mmc_register_driver(struct mmc_driver *);
extern void mmc_unregister_driver(struct mmc_driver *);
static inline int mmc_card_claim_host(struct mmc_card *card)
{
return __mmc_claim_host(card->host, card);
}
#define mmc_card_release_host(c) mmc_release_host((c)->host)
#endif