android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8350/arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c

304 lines
7.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Kernel Probes (KProbes)
* arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*
* Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2002, 2004
*
* 2002-Oct Created by Vamsi Krishna S <vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com> Kernel
* Probes initial implementation ( includes contributions from
* Rusty Russell).
* 2004-July Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> added jumper probes
* interface to access function arguments.
* 2004-Nov Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> kprobes port
* for PPC64
*/
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/kdebug.h>
#include <asm/sstep.h>
/* kprobe_status settings */
#define KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE 0x00000001
#define KPROBE_HIT_SS 0x00000002
static struct kprobe *current_kprobe;
static unsigned long kprobe_status, kprobe_saved_msr;
static struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs;
int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
int ret = 0;
kprobe_opcode_t insn = *p->addr;
if ((unsigned long)p->addr & 0x03) {
printk("Attempt to register kprobe at an unaligned address\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
} else if (IS_MTMSRD(insn) || IS_RFID(insn)) {
printk("Cannot register a kprobe on rfid or mtmsrd\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
}
return ret;
}
void arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
p->opcode = *p->addr;
}
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
*p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION;
flush_icache_range((unsigned long) p->addr,
(unsigned long) p->addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
}
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
*p->addr = p->opcode;
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
flush_icache_range((unsigned long) p->addr,
(unsigned long) p->addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
}
void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
}
static inline void prepare_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs->msr |= MSR_SE;
/*single step inline if it a breakpoint instruction*/
if (p->opcode == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)
regs->nip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
else
regs->nip = (unsigned long)&p->ainsn.insn;
}
static inline int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe *p;
int ret = 0;
unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)regs->nip;
/* Check we're not actually recursing */
if (kprobe_running()) {
/* We *are* holding lock here, so this is safe.
Disarm the probe we just hit, and ignore it. */
p = get_kprobe(addr);
if (p) {
if (kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS) {
regs->msr &= ~MSR_SE;
regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
unlock_kprobes();
goto no_kprobe;
}
[PATCH] Move kprobe [dis]arming into arch specific code The architecture independent code of the current kprobes implementation is arming and disarming kprobes at registration time. The problem is that the code is assuming that arming and disarming is a just done by a simple write of some magic value to an address. This is problematic for ia64 where our instructions look more like structures, and we can not insert break points by just doing something like: *p->addr = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; The following patch to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 adds two new architecture dependent functions: * void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) and then adds the new functions for each of the architectures that already implement kprobes (spar64/ppc64/i386/x86_64). I thought arch_[dis]arm_kprobe was the most descriptive of what was really happening, but each of the architectures already had a disarm_kprobe() function that was really a "disarm and do some other clean-up items as needed when you stumble across a recursive kprobe." So... I took the liberty of changing the code that was calling disarm_kprobe() to call arch_disarm_kprobe(), and then do the cleanup in the block of code dealing with the recursive kprobe case. So far this patch as been tested on i386, x86_64, and ppc64, but still needs to be tested in sparc64. Signed-off-by: Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 03:09:25 -04:00
arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
regs->nip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
ret = 1;
} else {
p = current_kprobe;
if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
goto ss_probe;
}
}
/* If it's not ours, can't be delete race, (we hold lock). */
goto no_kprobe;
}
lock_kprobes();
p = get_kprobe(addr);
if (!p) {
unlock_kprobes();
if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
/*
* PowerPC has multiple variants of the "trap"
* instruction. If the current instruction is a
* trap variant, it could belong to someone else
*/
kprobe_opcode_t cur_insn = *addr;
if (IS_TW(cur_insn) || IS_TD(cur_insn) ||
IS_TWI(cur_insn) || IS_TDI(cur_insn))
goto no_kprobe;
/*
* The breakpoint instruction was removed right
* after we hit it. Another cpu has removed
* either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
* at this address. In either case, no further
* handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
*/
ret = 1;
}
/* Not one of ours: let kernel handle it */
goto no_kprobe;
}
kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
current_kprobe = p;
kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
if (p->pre_handler && p->pre_handler(p, regs))
/* handler has already set things up, so skip ss setup */
return 1;
ss_probe:
prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
/*
* This preempt_disable() matches the preempt_enable_no_resched()
* in post_kprobe_handler().
*/
preempt_disable();
return 1;
no_kprobe:
return ret;
}
/*
* Called after single-stepping. p->addr is the address of the
* instruction whose first byte has been replaced by the "breakpoint"
* instruction. To avoid the SMP problems that can occur when we
* temporarily put back the original opcode to single-step, we
* single-stepped a copy of the instruction. The address of this
* copy is p->ainsn.insn.
*/
static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ret;
regs->nip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
ret = emulate_step(regs, p->ainsn.insn[0]);
if (ret == 0)
regs->nip = (unsigned long)p->addr + 4;
}
static inline int post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (!kprobe_running())
return 0;
if (current_kprobe->post_handler)
current_kprobe->post_handler(current_kprobe, regs, 0);
resume_execution(current_kprobe, regs);
regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
unlock_kprobes();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
/*
* if somebody else is singlestepping across a probe point, msr
* will have SE set, in which case, continue the remaining processing
* of do_debug, as if this is not a probe hit.
*/
if (regs->msr & MSR_SE)
return 0;
return 1;
}
/* Interrupts disabled, kprobe_lock held. */
static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
if (current_kprobe->fault_handler
&& current_kprobe->fault_handler(current_kprobe, regs, trapnr))
return 1;
if (kprobe_status & KPROBE_HIT_SS) {
resume_execution(current_kprobe, regs);
regs->msr &= ~MSR_SE;
regs->msr |= kprobe_saved_msr;
unlock_kprobes();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Wrapper routine to for handling exceptions.
*/
int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
void *data)
{
struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
/*
* Interrupts are not disabled here. We need to disable
* preemption, because kprobe_running() uses smp_processor_id().
*/
preempt_disable();
switch (val) {
case DIE_BPT:
if (kprobe_handler(args->regs))
ret = NOTIFY_STOP;
break;
case DIE_SSTEP:
if (post_kprobe_handler(args->regs))
ret = NOTIFY_STOP;
break;
case DIE_GPF:
case DIE_PAGE_FAULT:
if (kprobe_running() &&
kprobe_fault_handler(args->regs, args->trapnr))
ret = NOTIFY_STOP;
break;
default:
break;
}
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
int setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp);
memcpy(&jprobe_saved_regs, regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
/* setup return addr to the jprobe handler routine */
regs->nip = (unsigned long)(((func_descr_t *)jp->entry)->entry);
regs->gpr[2] = (unsigned long)(((func_descr_t *)jp->entry)->toc);
return 1;
}
void jprobe_return(void)
{
asm volatile("trap" ::: "memory");
}
void jprobe_return_end(void)
{
};
int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* FIXME - we should ideally be validating that we got here 'cos
* of the "trap" in jprobe_return() above, before restoring the
* saved regs...
*/
memcpy(regs, &jprobe_saved_regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
return 1;
}