android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8350/include/linux/rcupdate.h

250 lines
9.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Read-Copy Update mechanism for mutual exclusion
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2001
*
* Author: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
*
* Based on the original work by Paul McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
* and inputs from Rusty Russell, Andrea Arcangeli and Andi Kleen.
* Papers:
* http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/paper/rclockpdcsproof.pdf
* http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock_OLS.2001.05.01c.sc.pdf (OLS2001)
*
* For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see -
* http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rcupdate.html
*
*/
#ifndef __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H
#define __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
/**
* struct rcu_head - callback structure for use with RCU
* @next: next update requests in a list
* @func: actual update function to call after the grace period.
*/
struct rcu_head {
struct rcu_head *next;
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head);
};
#ifdef CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU
#include <linux/rcuclassic.h>
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU */
#include <linux/rcupreempt.h>
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU */
[PATCH] files: fix rcu initializers First of a number of files_lock scaability patches. Here are the x86 numbers - tiobench on a 4(8)-way (HT) P4 system on ramdisk : (lockfree) Test 2.6.10-vanilla Stdev 2.6.10-fd Stdev ------------------------------------------------------------- Seqread 1400.8 11.52 1465.4 34.27 Randread 1594 8.86 2397.2 29.21 Seqwrite 242.72 3.47 238.46 6.53 Randwrite 445.74 9.15 446.4 9.75 The performance improvement is very significant. We are getting killed by the cacheline bouncing of the files_struct lock here. Writes on ramdisk (ext2) seems to vary just too much to get any meaningful number. Also, With Tridge's thread_perf test on a 4(8)-way (HT) P4 xeon system : 2.6.12-rc5-vanilla : Running test 'readwrite' with 8 tasks Threads 0.34 +/- 0.01 seconds Processes 0.16 +/- 0.00 seconds 2.6.12-rc5-fd : Running test 'readwrite' with 8 tasks Threads 0.17 +/- 0.02 seconds Processes 0.17 +/- 0.02 seconds I repeated the measurements on ramfs (as opposed to ext2 on ramdisk in the earlier measurement) and I got more consistent results from tiobench : 4(8) way xeon P4 ----------------- (lock-free) Test 2.6.12-rc5 Stdev 2.6.12-rc5-fd Stdev ------------------------------------------------------------- Seqread 1282 18.59 1343.6 26.37 Randread 1517 7 2415 34.27 Seqwrite 702.2 5.27 709.46 5.9 Randwrite 846.86 15.15 919.68 21.4 4-way ppc64 ------------ (lock-free) Test 2.6.12-rc5 Stdev 2.6.12-rc5-fd Stdev ------------------------------------------------------------- Seqread 1549 91.16 1569.6 47.2 Randread 1473.6 25.11 1585.4 69.99 Seqwrite 1096.8 20.03 1136 29.61 Randwrite 1189.6 4.04 1275.2 32.96 Also running Tridge's thread_perf test on ppc64 : 2.6.12-rc5-vanilla -------------------- Running test 'readwrite' with 4 tasks Threads 0.20 +/- 0.02 seconds Processes 0.16 +/- 0.01 seconds 2.6.12-rc5-fd -------------------- Running test 'readwrite' with 4 tasks Threads 0.18 +/- 0.04 seconds Processes 0.16 +/- 0.01 seconds The benefits are huge (upto ~60%) in some cases on x86 primarily due to the atomic operations during acquisition of ->file_lock and cache line bouncing in fast path. ppc64 benefits are modest due to LL/SC based locking, but still statistically significant. This patch: RCU head initilizer no longer needs the head varible name since we don't use list.h lists anymore. Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-09 16:04:07 -04:00
#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL }
#define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT
#define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \
(ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \
} while (0)
/**
* rcu_read_lock - mark the beginning of an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* When synchronize_rcu() is invoked on one CPU while other CPUs
* are within RCU read-side critical sections, then the
* synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to block until after all the other
* CPUs exit their critical sections. Similarly, if call_rcu() is invoked
* on one CPU while other CPUs are within RCU read-side critical
* sections, invocation of the corresponding RCU callback is deferred
* until after the all the other CPUs exit their critical sections.
*
* Note, however, that RCU callbacks are permitted to run concurrently
* with RCU read-side critical sections. One way that this can happen
* is via the following sequence of events: (1) CPU 0 enters an RCU
* read-side critical section, (2) CPU 1 invokes call_rcu() to register
* an RCU callback, (3) CPU 0 exits the RCU read-side critical section,
* (4) CPU 2 enters a RCU read-side critical section, (5) the RCU
* callback is invoked. This is legal, because the RCU read-side critical
* section that was running concurrently with the call_rcu() (and which
* therefore might be referencing something that the corresponding RCU
* callback would free up) has completed before the corresponding
* RCU callback is invoked.
*
* RCU read-side critical sections may be nested. Any deferred actions
* will be deferred until the outermost RCU read-side critical section
* completes.
*
* It is illegal to block while in an RCU read-side critical section.
*/
#define rcu_read_lock() __rcu_read_lock()
/**
* rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* See rcu_read_lock() for more information.
*/
/*
* So where is rcu_write_lock()? It does not exist, as there is no
* way for writers to lock out RCU readers. This is a feature, not
* a bug -- this property is what provides RCU's performance benefits.
* Of course, writers must coordinate with each other. The normal
* spinlock primitives work well for this, but any other technique may be
* used as well. RCU does not care how the writers keep out of each
* others' way, as long as they do so.
*/
#define rcu_read_unlock() __rcu_read_unlock()
/**
* rcu_read_lock_bh - mark the beginning of a softirq-only RCU critical section
*
* This is equivalent of rcu_read_lock(), but to be used when updates
* are being done using call_rcu_bh(). Since call_rcu_bh() callbacks
* consider completion of a softirq handler to be a quiescent state,
* a process in RCU read-side critical section must be protected by
* disabling softirqs. Read-side critical sections in interrupt context
* can use just rcu_read_lock().
*
*/
#define rcu_read_lock_bh() __rcu_read_lock_bh()
/*
* rcu_read_unlock_bh - marks the end of a softirq-only RCU critical section
*
* See rcu_read_lock_bh() for more information.
*/
#define rcu_read_unlock_bh() __rcu_read_unlock_bh()
/*
* Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching accesses. The compiler
* is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of ACCESS_ONCE(),
* but only when the compiler is aware of some particular ordering. One way
* to make the compiler aware of ordering is to put the two invocations of
* ACCESS_ONCE() in different C statements.
*
* This macro does absolutely -nothing- to prevent the CPU from reordering,
* merging, or refetching absolutely anything at any time.
*/
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
/**
* rcu_dereference - fetch an RCU-protected pointer in an
* RCU read-side critical section. This pointer may later
* be safely dereferenced.
*
* Inserts memory barriers on architectures that require them
* (currently only the Alpha), and, more importantly, documents
* exactly which pointers are protected by RCU.
*/
#define rcu_dereference(p) ({ \
typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
(_________p1); \
})
/**
* rcu_assign_pointer - assign (publicize) a pointer to a newly
* initialized structure that will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
* critical sections. Returns the value assigned.
*
* Inserts memory barriers on architectures that require them
* (pretty much all of them other than x86), and also prevents
* the compiler from reordering the code that initializes the
* structure after the pointer assignment. More importantly, this
* call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
* code.
*/
#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
({ \
if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \
((v) != NULL)) \
smp_wmb(); \
(p) = (v); \
})
/**
* synchronize_sched - block until all CPUs have exited any non-preemptive
* kernel code sequences.
*
* This means that all preempt_disable code sequences, including NMI and
* hardware-interrupt handlers, in progress on entry will have completed
* before this primitive returns. However, this does not guarantee that
* softirq handlers will have completed, since in some kernels, these
* handlers can run in process context, and can block.
*
* This primitive provides the guarantees made by the (now removed)
* synchronize_kernel() API. In contrast, synchronize_rcu() only
* guarantees that rcu_read_lock() sections will have completed.
* In "classic RCU", these two guarantees happen to be one and
* the same, but can differ in realtime RCU implementations.
*/
#define synchronize_sched() __synchronize_sched()
/**
* call_rcu - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
* @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
* @func: actual update function to be invoked after the grace period
*
* The update function will be invoked some time after a full grace
* period elapses, in other words after all currently executing RCU
* read-side critical sections have completed. RCU read-side critical
* sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(),
* and may be nested.
*/
extern void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
/**
* call_rcu_bh - Queue an RCU for invocation after a quicker grace period.
* @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
* @func: actual update function to be invoked after the grace period
*
* The update function will be invoked some time after a full grace
* period elapses, in other words after all currently executing RCU
* read-side critical sections have completed. call_rcu_bh() assumes
* that the read-side critical sections end on completion of a softirq
* handler. This means that read-side critical sections in process
* context must not be interrupted by softirqs. This interface is to be
* used when most of the read-side critical sections are in softirq context.
* RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by :
* - rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), if in interrupt context.
* OR
* - rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), if in process context.
* These may be nested.
*/
extern void call_rcu_bh(struct rcu_head *head,
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
/* Exported common interfaces */
extern void synchronize_rcu(void);
extern void rcu_barrier(void);
extern long rcu_batches_completed(void);
extern long rcu_batches_completed_bh(void);
/* Internal to kernel */
extern void rcu_init(void);
extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H */