rfs: annotate lockless accesses to sk->sk_rxhash
[ Upstream commit 1e5c647c3f6d4f8497dedcd226204e1880e0ffb3 ]
Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() on accesses to sk->sk_rxhash.
This also prevents a (smart ?) compiler to remove the condition in:
if (sk->sk_rxhash != newval)
sk->sk_rxhash = newval;
We need the condition to avoid dirtying a shared cache line.
Fixes: fec5e652e5
("rfs: Receive Flow Steering")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a4c72805fd
commit
28ac3cf2ac
@ -997,8 +997,12 @@ static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
|
||||
* OR an additional socket flag
|
||||
* [1] : sk_state and sk_prot are in the same cache line.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
|
||||
sock_rps_record_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
|
||||
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
|
||||
/* This READ_ONCE() is paired with the WRITE_ONCE()
|
||||
* from sock_rps_save_rxhash() and sock_rps_reset_rxhash().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
sock_rps_record_flow_hash(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1007,15 +1011,19 @@ static inline void sock_rps_save_rxhash(struct sock *sk,
|
||||
const struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
|
||||
if (unlikely(sk->sk_rxhash != skb->hash))
|
||||
sk->sk_rxhash = skb->hash;
|
||||
/* The following WRITE_ONCE() is paired with the READ_ONCE()
|
||||
* here, and another one in sock_rps_record_flow().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash) != skb->hash))
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash, skb->hash);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void sock_rps_reset_rxhash(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
|
||||
sk->sk_rxhash = 0;
|
||||
/* Paired with READ_ONCE() in sock_rps_record_flow() */
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash, 0);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user