blk-mq: consider non-idle request as "inflight" in blk_mq_rq_inflight()
commit 05a4fed69ff00a8bd83538684cb602a4636b07a7 upstream.
dm-multipath is the only user of blk_mq_queue_inflight(). When
dm-multipath calls blk_mq_queue_inflight() to check if it has
outstanding IO it can get a false negative. The reason for this is
blk_mq_rq_inflight() doesn't consider requests that are no longer
MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT but that are now MQ_RQ_COMPLETE (->complete isn't
called or finished yet) as "inflight".
This causes request-based dm-multipath's dm_wait_for_completion() to
return before all outstanding dm-multipath requests have actually
completed. This breaks DM multipath's suspend functionality because
blk-mq requests complete after DM's suspend has finished -- which
shouldn't happen.
Fix this by considering any request not in the MQ_RQ_IDLE state
(so either MQ_RQ_COMPLETE or MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT) as "inflight" in
blk_mq_rq_inflight().
Fixes: 3c94d83cb3
("blk-mq: change blk_mq_queue_busy() to blk_mq_queue_inflight()")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dfd182451
commit
49a7ac29f6
@ -829,10 +829,10 @@ static bool blk_mq_rq_inflight(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
|
|||||||
void *priv, bool reserved)
|
void *priv, bool reserved)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If we find a request that is inflight and the queue matches,
|
* If we find a request that isn't idle and the queue matches,
|
||||||
* we know the queue is busy. Return false to stop the iteration.
|
* we know the queue is busy. Return false to stop the iteration.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (rq->state == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT && rq->q == hctx->queue) {
|
if (blk_mq_request_started(rq) && rq->q == hctx->queue) {
|
||||||
bool *busy = priv;
|
bool *busy = priv;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*busy = true;
|
*busy = true;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user