diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index e6fb537b4bfc..102bdfd6f72c 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -919,6 +919,36 @@ static int bfq_io_show_weight(struct seq_file *sf, void *v) return 0; } +static void bfq_group_set_weight(struct bfq_group *bfqg, u64 weight) +{ + /* + * Setting the prio_changed flag of the entity + * to 1 with new_weight == weight would re-set + * the value of the weight to its ioprio mapping. + * Set the flag only if necessary. + */ + if ((unsigned short)weight != bfqg->entity.new_weight) { + bfqg->entity.new_weight = (unsigned short)weight; + /* + * Make sure that the above new value has been + * stored in bfqg->entity.new_weight before + * setting the prio_changed flag. In fact, + * this flag may be read asynchronously (in + * critical sections protected by a different + * lock than that held here), and finding this + * flag set may cause the execution of the code + * for updating parameters whose value may + * depend also on bfqg->entity.new_weight (in + * __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio). + * This barrier makes sure that the new value + * of bfqg->entity.new_weight is correctly + * seen in that code. + */ + smp_wmb(); + bfqg->entity.prio_changed = 1; + } +} + static int bfq_io_set_weight_legacy(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, struct cftype *cftype, u64 val) @@ -937,34 +967,8 @@ static int bfq_io_set_weight_legacy(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, hlist_for_each_entry(blkg, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node) { struct bfq_group *bfqg = blkg_to_bfqg(blkg); - if (!bfqg) - continue; - /* - * Setting the prio_changed flag of the entity - * to 1 with new_weight == weight would re-set - * the value of the weight to its ioprio mapping. - * Set the flag only if necessary. - */ - if ((unsigned short)val != bfqg->entity.new_weight) { - bfqg->entity.new_weight = (unsigned short)val; - /* - * Make sure that the above new value has been - * stored in bfqg->entity.new_weight before - * setting the prio_changed flag. In fact, - * this flag may be read asynchronously (in - * critical sections protected by a different - * lock than that held here), and finding this - * flag set may cause the execution of the code - * for updating parameters whose value may - * depend also on bfqg->entity.new_weight (in - * __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio). - * This barrier makes sure that the new value - * of bfqg->entity.new_weight is correctly - * seen in that code. - */ - smp_wmb(); - bfqg->entity.prio_changed = 1; - } + if (bfqg) + bfq_group_set_weight(bfqg, val); } spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);