ipmi: fix long wait in unload when IPMI disconnect
commit f6f1234d98cce69578bfac79df147a1f6660596c upstream. When fixing the problem mentioned in PATCH1, we also found the following problem: If the IPMI is disconnected and in the sending process, the uninstallation driver will be stuck for a long time. The main problem is that uninstalling the driver waits for curr_msg to be sent or HOSED. After stopping tasklet, the only place to trigger the timeout mechanism is the circular poll in shutdown_smi. The poll function delays 10us and calls smi_event_handler(smi_info,10). Smi_event_handler deducts 10us from kcs->ibf_timeout. But the poll func is followed by schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1). The time consumed here is not counted in kcs->ibf_timeout. So when 10us is deducted from kcs->ibf_timeout, at least 1 jiffies has actually passed. The waiting time has increased by more than a hundredfold. Now instead of calling poll(). call smi_event_handler() directly and calculate the elapsed time. For verification, you can directly use ebpf to check the kcs-> ibf_timeout for each call to kcs_event() when IPMI is disconnected. Decrement at normal rate before unloading. The decrement rate becomes very slow after unloading. $ bpftrace -e 'kprobe:kcs_event {printf("kcs->ibftimeout : %d\n", *(arg0+584));}' Signed-off-by: Zhang Yuchen <zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com> Message-Id: <20221007092617.87597-3-zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4f48c648a
commit
74531c23ad
@ -2157,6 +2157,20 @@ skip_fallback_noirq:
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
module_init(init_ipmi_si);
|
module_init(init_ipmi_si);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void wait_msg_processed(struct smi_info *smi_info)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
unsigned long jiffies_now;
|
||||||
|
long time_diff;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
while (smi_info->curr_msg || (smi_info->si_state != SI_NORMAL)) {
|
||||||
|
jiffies_now = jiffies;
|
||||||
|
time_diff = (((long)jiffies_now - (long)smi_info->last_timeout_jiffies)
|
||||||
|
* SI_USEC_PER_JIFFY);
|
||||||
|
smi_event_handler(smi_info, time_diff);
|
||||||
|
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void shutdown_smi(void *send_info)
|
static void shutdown_smi(void *send_info)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
|
struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
|
||||||
@ -2191,16 +2205,13 @@ static void shutdown_smi(void *send_info)
|
|||||||
* in the BMC. Note that timers and CPU interrupts are off,
|
* in the BMC. Note that timers and CPU interrupts are off,
|
||||||
* so no need for locks.
|
* so no need for locks.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
while (smi_info->curr_msg || (smi_info->si_state != SI_NORMAL)) {
|
wait_msg_processed(smi_info);
|
||||||
poll(smi_info);
|
|
||||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if (smi_info->handlers)
|
if (smi_info->handlers)
|
||||||
disable_si_irq(smi_info);
|
disable_si_irq(smi_info);
|
||||||
while (smi_info->curr_msg || (smi_info->si_state != SI_NORMAL)) {
|
|
||||||
poll(smi_info);
|
wait_msg_processed(smi_info);
|
||||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if (smi_info->handlers)
|
if (smi_info->handlers)
|
||||||
smi_info->handlers->cleanup(smi_info->si_sm);
|
smi_info->handlers->cleanup(smi_info->si_sm);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user