exfat: release s_lock before calling dir_emit()
There is a potential deadlock reported by syzbot as below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.4.0-next-20230707-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor330/5073 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880218527a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:151 [inline] ffff8880218527a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: get_mmap_lock_carefully mm/memory.c:5293 [inline] ffff8880218527a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x369/0x510 mm/memory.c:5344 but task is already holding lock: ffff888019f760e0 (&sbi->s_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: exfat_iterate+0x117/0xb50 fs/exfat/dir.c:232 which lock already depends on the new lock. Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock --> mapping.invalidate_lock#3 --> &sbi->s_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sbi->s_lock); lock(mapping.invalidate_lock#3); lock(&sbi->s_lock); rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); Let's try to avoid above potential deadlock condition by moving dir_emit*() out of sbi->s_lock coverage. Fixes: ca06197382bd ("exfat: add directory operations") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v5.7+ Reported-by: syzbot+1741a5d9b79989c10bdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/00000000000078ee7e060066270b@google.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bf9ccffd2
commit
803d714374
27
dir.c
27
dir.c
@ -219,7 +219,10 @@ static void exfat_free_namebuf(struct exfat_dentry_namebuf *nb)
|
||||
exfat_init_namebuf(nb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* skip iterating emit_dots when dir is empty */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Before calling dir_emit*(), sbi->s_lock should be released
|
||||
* because page fault can occur in dir_emit*().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ITER_POS_FILLED_DOTS (2)
|
||||
static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -234,11 +237,10 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
|
||||
int err = 0, fake_offset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
exfat_init_namebuf(nb);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&EXFAT_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
cpos = ctx->pos;
|
||||
if (!dir_emit_dots(filp, ctx))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctx->pos == ITER_POS_FILLED_DOTS) {
|
||||
cpos = 0;
|
||||
@ -250,16 +252,18 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
|
||||
/* name buffer should be allocated before use */
|
||||
err = exfat_alloc_namebuf(nb);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
get_new:
|
||||
mutex_lock(&EXFAT_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ei->flags == ALLOC_NO_FAT_CHAIN && cpos >= i_size_read(inode))
|
||||
goto end_of_dir;
|
||||
|
||||
err = exfat_readdir(inode, &cpos, &de);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* At least we tried to read a sector. Move cpos to next sector
|
||||
* position (should be aligned).
|
||||
* At least we tried to read a sector.
|
||||
* Move cpos to next sector position (should be aligned).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (err == -EIO) {
|
||||
cpos += 1 << (sb->s_blocksize_bits);
|
||||
@ -282,16 +286,10 @@ get_new:
|
||||
inum = iunique(sb, EXFAT_ROOT_INO);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Before calling dir_emit(), sb_lock should be released.
|
||||
* Because page fault can occur in dir_emit() when the size
|
||||
* of buffer given from user is larger than one page size.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&EXFAT_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
if (!dir_emit(ctx, nb->lfn, strlen(nb->lfn), inum,
|
||||
(de.attr & ATTR_SUBDIR) ? DT_DIR : DT_REG))
|
||||
goto out_unlocked;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&EXFAT_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
ctx->pos = cpos;
|
||||
goto get_new;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -299,9 +297,8 @@ end_of_dir:
|
||||
if (!cpos && fake_offset)
|
||||
cpos = ITER_POS_FILLED_DOTS;
|
||||
ctx->pos = cpos;
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&EXFAT_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
out_unlocked:
|
||||
out:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* To improve performance, free namebuf after unlock sb_lock.
|
||||
* If namebuf is not allocated, this function do nothing
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user