tools/vm/slabinfo: use alphabetic order when two values are equal
commit 4f5ceb8851f0081af54313abbf56de1615911faf upstream.
When the number of partial slabs in each cache is the same (e.g., the
value are 0), the results of the `slabinfo -X -N5` and `slabinfo -P -N5`
are different.
/ # slabinfo -X -N5
...
Slabs sorted by number of partial slabs
---------------------------------------
Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg
inode_cache 15180 392 6217728 758/0/1 20 1 0 95 a
kernfs_node_cache 22494 88 2002944 488/0/1 46 0 0 98
shmem_inode_cache 663 464 319488 38/0/1 17 1 0 96
biovec-max 50 3072 163840 4/0/1 10 3 0 93 A
dentry 19050 136 2600960 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a
/ # slabinfo -P -N5
Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg
bdev_cache 32 984 32.7K 1/0/1 16 2 0 96 Aa
ext4_inode_cache 42 752 32.7K 1/0/1 21 2 0 96 a
dentry 19050 136 2.6M 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a
TCPv6 17 1840 32.7K 0/0/1 17 3 0 95 A
RAWv6 18 856 16.3K 0/0/1 18 2 0 94 A
This problem is caused by the sort_slabs(). So let's use alphabetic order
when two values are equal in the sort_slabs().
By the way, the content of the `slabinfo -h` is not aligned because the
`-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs`
uses tabs instead of spaces. So let's use spaces instead of tabs to fix
it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220528063117.935158-1-songyuanzheng@huawei.com
Fixes: 1106b205a3
("tools/vm/slabinfo: add partial slab listing to -X")
Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
12f777a957
commit
a91204264e
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void usage(void)
|
|||||||
"-n|--numa Show NUMA information\n"
|
"-n|--numa Show NUMA information\n"
|
||||||
"-N|--lines=K Show the first K slabs\n"
|
"-N|--lines=K Show the first K slabs\n"
|
||||||
"-o|--ops Show kmem_cache_ops\n"
|
"-o|--ops Show kmem_cache_ops\n"
|
||||||
"-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n"
|
"-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n"
|
||||||
"-r|--report Detailed report on single slabs\n"
|
"-r|--report Detailed report on single slabs\n"
|
||||||
"-s|--shrink Shrink slabs\n"
|
"-s|--shrink Shrink slabs\n"
|
||||||
"-S|--Size Sort by size\n"
|
"-S|--Size Sort by size\n"
|
||||||
@ -1045,15 +1045,27 @@ static void sort_slabs(void)
|
|||||||
for (s2 = s1 + 1; s2 < slabinfo + slabs; s2++) {
|
for (s2 = s1 + 1; s2 < slabinfo + slabs; s2++) {
|
||||||
int result;
|
int result;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sort_size)
|
if (sort_size) {
|
||||||
result = slab_size(s1) < slab_size(s2);
|
if (slab_size(s1) == slab_size(s2))
|
||||||
else if (sort_active)
|
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
||||||
result = slab_activity(s1) < slab_activity(s2);
|
else
|
||||||
else if (sort_loss)
|
result = slab_size(s1) < slab_size(s2);
|
||||||
result = slab_waste(s1) < slab_waste(s2);
|
} else if (sort_active) {
|
||||||
else if (sort_partial)
|
if (slab_activity(s1) == slab_activity(s2))
|
||||||
result = s1->partial < s2->partial;
|
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
|
result = slab_activity(s1) < slab_activity(s2);
|
||||||
|
} else if (sort_loss) {
|
||||||
|
if (slab_waste(s1) == slab_waste(s2))
|
||||||
|
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
result = slab_waste(s1) < slab_waste(s2);
|
||||||
|
} else if (sort_partial) {
|
||||||
|
if (s1->partial == s2->partial)
|
||||||
|
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
result = s1->partial < s2->partial;
|
||||||
|
} else
|
||||||
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
result = strcasecmp(s1->name, s2->name);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (show_inverted)
|
if (show_inverted)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user