pwm: sprd: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped
[ Upstream commit 65e2e6c1c20104ed19060a38f4edbf14e9f9a9a5 ]
As the last call to sprd_pwm_apply() might have exited early if
state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in
pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be
ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM.
Fixes: 8aae4b02e8
("pwm: sprd: Add Spreadtrum PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a37ca2a076
commit
ae9b644344
@ -180,13 +180,10 @@ static int sprd_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (state->period != cstate->period ||
|
ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
|
||||||
state->duty_cycle != cstate->duty_cycle) {
|
state->period);
|
||||||
ret = sprd_pwm_config(spc, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
|
if (ret)
|
||||||
state->period);
|
return ret;
|
||||||
if (ret)
|
|
||||||
return ret;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sprd_pwm_write(spc, pwm->hwpwm, SPRD_PWM_ENABLE, 1);
|
sprd_pwm_write(spc, pwm->hwpwm, SPRD_PWM_ENABLE, 1);
|
||||||
} else if (cstate->enabled) {
|
} else if (cstate->enabled) {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user