ASoC: rt5668: do not block workqueue if card is unbound
[ Upstream commit a6d78661dc903d90a327892bbc34268f3a5f4b9c ] The current rt5668_jack_detect_handler() assumes the component and card will always show up and implements an infinite usleep loop waiting for them to show up. This does not hold true if a codec interrupt (or other event) occurs when the card is unbound. The codec driver's remove or shutdown functions cannot cancel the workqueue due to the wait loop. As a result, code can either end up blocking the workqueue, or hit a kernel oops when the card is freed. Fix the issue by rescheduling the jack detect handler in case the card is not ready. In case card never shows up, the shutdown/remove/suspend calls can now cancel the detect task. Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Shuming Fan <shumingf@realtek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220207153000.3452802-2-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b7c65abeb
commit
e2106e429f
@ -1022,11 +1022,13 @@ static void rt5668_jack_detect_handler(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
container_of(work, struct rt5668_priv, jack_detect_work.work);
|
||||
int val, btn_type;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!rt5668->component)
|
||||
usleep_range(10000, 15000);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!rt5668->component->card->instantiated)
|
||||
usleep_range(10000, 15000);
|
||||
if (!rt5668->component || !rt5668->component->card ||
|
||||
!rt5668->component->card->instantiated) {
|
||||
/* card not yet ready, try later */
|
||||
mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
|
||||
&rt5668->jack_detect_work, msecs_to_jiffies(15));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rt5668->calibrate_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user