a numa system (with multi HT chains) may return node without ram. Aka it
is not online. Try to get an online node, otherwise return -1.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Some HP laptops have a problem with their DSDT reporting as
HP/SB400/10000, which includes some code which overrides all temperature
trip points to 16C if the INTIN2 input of the I/O APIC is enabled. This
input is incorrectly designated the ISA IRQ 0 via an interrupt source
override even though it is wired to the output of the master 8259A and
INTIN0 is not connected at all. So far two models have been identified,
namely nx6125 and nx6325.
Use a knob provided by the I/O APIC interrupt registration code to
abandon any attempts to route IRQ 0 through the I/O APIC for these
systems.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As discovered recently some systems exhibit problems when the 8254 timer
IRQ is routed through the I/O APIC. These problems do not affect the
timer IRQ itself and therefore cannot be detected when the correctness of
operation of the interrupt is verified in check_timer(). Therefore the
I/O APIC path of the timer IRQ has to be disabled entirely.
This is a change that lets platforms ask for the timer IRQ not to be
registered in the I/O APIC interrupt tables. The local APIC and ExtINTA
paths are unaffected. This request is only taken into account for ACPI
platforms as MP table systems seem unaffected so far.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> said:
> Given X86_64 selects X86_LOCAL_APIC I am not sure the redundancy seen
>above does not actually obscure the logic behind... I think:
>
> depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && !X86_VISWS
>
>would be clearer and get the same.
Suggested-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
v2: seperate "fix for compiling when MPPARSE is not set" to another patch
make X86_MPPARSE to be selectable only when acpi is set and
X86_MPPARSE will be set if acpi is not set.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
if the system doesn't have ioapic, we don't need to store entries for mptable
update
also let mp_config_acpi_gsi not call func in mpparse
so later could decouple mpparse with acpi more easily
Reported-by: Daniel Exner <dex@dragonslave.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Exner <dex@dragonslave.de>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
1. let 64bit support 88 and e801 too
2. introduce default_machine_specific_memory_setup, and reuse it
for voyager
v2: fix 64 bit compiling
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
seperate SRAT finding and parsing from get_memcfg_from_srat,
and let getmemcfg_from_srat only handle array from previous step.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
we already have summit and etc depends on genericarch,
so use genericarch only.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so don't punish all other cpus without that problem when init highmem
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
and make 32-bit resource registration more like 64 bit.
also move probe_roms back to setup_32.c
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Because of the size limits of struct boot_params (zero page), the
maximum number of E820 memory map entries can be passed to kernel is
128. As pointed by Paul Jackson, there is some machine produced by SGI
with so many nodes that the number of E820 memory map entries is more
than 128. To enabling Linux kernel on these system, a new setup data
type named SETUP_E820_EXT is defined to pass additional memory map
entries to Linux kernel.
This patch is based on x86/auto-latest branch of git-x86 tree and has
been tested on x86_64 and i386 platform.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
use early_node_map to init high pages, so we can remove page_is_ram() and
page_is_reserved_early() in the big loop with add_one_highpage
also remove page_is_reserved_early(), it is not needed anymore.
v2: fix the build of other platforms
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
rename update_memory_range to e820_update_range
rename add_memory_region to e820_add_region
to make it more clear that they are about e820 map operations.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so we don't get the same value multiple times.
also make mp_config_acpi_legacy_irqs more readable by moving assignments
together.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Daniel Exner reported IO-APIC enumeration breakage in linux-next.
Alexey Starikovskiy found out that it might be related to
commit 2944e16b25 "x86: update mptable".
use enable_update_mptable to decide if need check before add mp_irqs array.
Reported-by: Daniel Exner <webmaster@dragonslave.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
1. move that before zone_sizes_init ...
2. add free_early for one old one, otherwise it will be be reserved again
when we init highmem.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
in case we have kva before ramdisk on a node, we still need to use
those ranges.
v2: reserve_early kva ram area, in case there are holes in highmem, to avoid
those area could be treat as free high pages.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
1. add reserve_bootmem_generic for 32bit
2. change len to unsigned long
3. make early_res_to_bootmem to use it
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
we are checking mptable early for numaq, so don't need to reserve_bootmem
for it. bootmem is not there yet.
do the same thing as 64-bit.
found it on 64g above system from 64-bit kernel kexec to 32 bit kernel with
numaq support.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
since we now have 32-bit support for e820_register_active_regions(),
we can merge the parsing of the mem=/memmap= boot parameters.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch uses reserve_bootmem_generic() instead of reserve_bootmem()
to reserve the crashkernel memory on x86_64. That's necessary for NUMA
machines, see 00212fef81:
[PATCH] Fix kdump Crash Kernel boot memory reservation for NUMA machines
This patch will fix a boot memory reservation bug that trashes memory on
the ES7000 when loading the kdump crash kernel.
The code in arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c to reserve boot memory for the crash
kernel uses the non-numa aware "reserve_bootmem" function instead of the
NUMA aware "reserve_bootmem_generic". I checked to make sure that no other
function was using "reserve_bootmem" and found none, except the ones that
had NUMA ifdef'ed out.
I have tested this patch only on an ES7000 with NUMA on and off (numa=off)
in a single (non-NUMA) and multi-cell (NUMA) configurations.
Signed-off-by: Amul Shah <amul.shah@unisys.com>
Looks-good-to: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The switch-back to reserve_bootmem() was accidentally introduced in
5c3391f9f7 when adding the BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch adds a 'flags' parameter to reserve_bootmem_generic() like it
already has been added in reserve_bootmem() with commit
72a7fe3967.
It also changes all users to use BOOTMEM_DEFAULT, which doesn't effectively
change the behaviour. Since the change is x86-specific, I don't think it's
necessary to add a new API for migration. There are only 4 users of that
function.
The change is necessary for the next patch, using reserve_bootmem_generic()
for crashkernel reservation.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> That helped a lot, the system seems to work normally now.
>
> Here's the relevant snippet from dmesg:
>
> [ 0.108006] ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> [ 0.108006] ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> [ 0.108006] ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... <3>
> [ 0.108006] ..... (found apic 0 pin 2) ...<3> failed.
> [ 0.108006] ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ...<3> works.
>
> and the whole thing is at: http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/debug/20080618/dmesg-2.log
Hmm, that only proved the 8259A is indeed wired to the pin #2 of the I/O
APIC.
> I, personally, don't have any and AMD only has SB600 documentation on its
> web page (it's still marked as "AMD confidential" ;-)).
Well, the IC block is most likely the same as that's not rocket science
and once done there is no need to fiddle with that. That written, I am
afraid there is nothing useful about the IC in the document, except that
it's there and consists of an I/O APIC providing 24 inputs and the usual
pair of 8259A cores. Thanks for the reference anyway.
> There is an interrupt controller in there, but I'm not sure if there's any
> 8259A. The northbridge is on the CPU, actually.
I will praise the day someone ships an x86 machine without an 8259A core!
As expressed in another mail I suspect there may actually be a direct
route from the 8254 to INTIN0 in the southbridge -- this is what other
bootstrap logs seen in the Internet suggest. This would mean this
particular BIOS is buggy (is it the latest version?) and provides an
incorrect IRQ override in its ACPI tables, for example because the
responsible block has been blindly copied from a machine using a commoner
wiring. This could be moderately easily fixed up with a quirk based on
the PCI ID (after checking it again, we actually used to have a quirk for
ATI in this area, but the way it was done suggests the issue was not
understood well enough).
Could you please remove the hack sent yesterday and test the patch
provided below? I do hope it builds, but I have no immediate means to
check it. Please report the output. The intent is to test INTIN0
directly before testing INTIN2 through the 8259A. Thanks.
Aside of that, what I have gathered from your reports (please correct me
if I have got it wrong) is that when the through-8259A mode is used, then
after a while 8254 timer interrupts stop arriving. What's interesting,
the "Virtual Wire IRQ" seems to work for you correctly (that's quite an
odd setup where a local APIC input is used in the native mode -- please
post /proc/interrupts for confirmation), which in turn implies the master
8259A drives its INT output as we expect. Why would the I/O APIC input
have problems then? Hmm...
[ mingo@elte.hu: revert the "x86: fix IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325"
version. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > With such a configuration the "x86: I/O APIC: timer through 8259A
> > second-chance" patch should not matter, because the only change it
> > introduces is an attempt to try the same I/O APIC pin again, but with the
> > IRQ0 line of the master 8259A enabled. That's not a terribly unusual
> > configuration and nothing should get confused in the system.
>
> But it _does_ get confused, really.
Something certainly gets confused, but so far I am not sure which bit
exactly it is, are you?
> > Barring the unlikely possibility of the 8259A actually being wired to
> > INTIN2 of the I/O APIC I can see two possible explanations:
> >
> > 1. The 8259A interrupt actually escapes to the CPU somehow and is handled
> > as an ExtINTA interrupt. This would make the code in check_timer()
> > decide it has found a working configuration, while actually it has been
> > fooled.
[...]
> Here you go:
>
> [ 0.108006] ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> [ 0.108006] ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> [ 0.108006] ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... <3>
> [ 0.108006] ..... (found apic 0 pin 2) ...<3> works.
>
> The full dmesg is at: http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/debug/20080618/dmesg-1.log
Thanks. In this case I suspect the case #1 quoted above happens, that is
the 8259A manages to deliver its interrupt somehow. Note at this stage it
is meant to be in the AEOI mode, so it can happily resubmit the interrupt
indefinitely with no additional handling as long as it receives INTA
cycles.
Can you please try the patch below on top of "x86: I/O APIC: timer
through 8259A second-chance" to see whether my hypothesis is true? It
modifies the through-8259A setup path so that the APIC input gets masked,
but the 8259A has the timer interrupt still enabled. Let me know how the
timer interrupt is routed in this case.
Bisected-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Each I/O APIC redirection table entry has a number of fields.
Define names for them to eliminate reference by hard coded
numbers.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
If configured to use the I/O APIC, the NMI watchdog is deemed to fail if
the chip has been deactivated as a result of "noapic". Downgrade to the
local APIC watchdog similarly to what is done for the UP case.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
If configured to use the I/O APIC, the NMI watchdog is deemed to fail if
the chip has been deactivated as a result of "nosmp". Downgrade to the
local APIC watchdog similarly to what is done for the UP case.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
For the UP case the NMI watchdog downgrade is done consistently in
APIC_init_uniprocessor() now. Remove redundant code used only when
BIOS-disabled local APIC is activated.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
If configured to use the I/O APIC, the NMI watchdog is deemed to fail if
the chip will not be used in the UP configuration, because "noapic" has
been specified or the chip is simply not there. Downgrade to the local
APIC watchdog to rectify.
The new #ifdef is ugly, I know. A proper solution is to provide suitable
definitions of smp_found_config, etc. for !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC in a header.
Likewise the whole if () condition should be moved to a static inline
function. Such clean-ups are beyond the scope of this change and can be
done once the whole issue of the timer has been sorted out.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
A downgrade helper for the NMI watchdog to be used in all places where
the I/O APIC watchdog may have been requested, but the I/O APIC is found
not to be there or meant to be left disabled. This is so that the
reconfiguration is cosistent and defined in a single place only.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
nmi_watchdog=1 hangs on 64-bit:
[ 0.250000] Detected 12.564 MHz APIC timer.
[ 0.254178] APIC timer registered as dummy, due to nmi_watchdog=1!
[ 0.260366] Testing NMI watchdog ... <4>WARNING: CPU#0: NMI appears to be stuck (0->0)!
[ ... ]
[ 0.470003] calling genl_init+0x0/0xd0
[ hard hang ]
bisected it down to:
git-bisect start
git-bisect good 1beee8dc8c
git-bisect bad 11582ece0aaa2d0f94f345c08a4ab9997078a083
git-bisect bad 5479c623bb44089844022c03d4c0eb16d5b7a15f
git-bisect bad cfb4c7fabeb499e1c29f9d1878968e37a938e28a
git-bisect good 246dd412d3
git-bisect bad 3f8237eaff7dc1e35fa791dae095574fd974e671
git-bisect good 90e23b13ab849e2a11f00c655eb3a2011b4623be
git-bisect bad 833526a34eeefc117df3191a594c3c3a4f15a9ac
git-bisect good 791b93d3dfaf16c23e978bec0cc0a3dd9d855d63
git-bisect bad 65767c64068f2c93e56a1accfed5c78230ac12d7
git-bisect bad 2abc5c05dd82c188e3bdf6641a274f013348d14b
git-bisect bad 317e1f2597ffb4d4db940577bbe56dc6e881ef07
| 317e1f2597ffb4d4db940577bbe56dc6e881ef07 is first bad commit
| commit 317e1f2597ffb4d4db940577bbe56dc6e881ef07
| Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
| Date: Wed May 21 22:10:22 2008 +0100
| x86: I/O APIC: clean up the 8259A on a NMI watchdog failure
the problem is that in the dummy-lapic branch we rely on the i8259A
but if the NMI watchdog fails we turn off IRQ 0 - which doesnt work
too well ;-)
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
