Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vlad Yasevich
d49d91d79a [SCTP]: Implement SCTP_PARTIAL_DELIVERY_POINT option.
This option induces partial delivery to run as soon
as the specified amount of data has been accumulated on
the association.  However, we give preference to fully
reassembled messages over PD messages.  In any case,
window and buffer is freed up.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@.hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-25 22:28:00 -07:00
Vlad Yasevich
b6e1331f3c [SCTP]: Implement SCTP_FRAGMENT_INTERLEAVE socket option
This option was introduced in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-13.  It
prevents head-of-line blocking in the case of one-to-many endpoint.
Applications enabling this option really must enable SCTP_SNDRCV event
so that they would know where the data belongs.  Based on an
earlier patch by Ivan Skytte Jørgensen.

Additionally, this functionality now permits multiple associations
on the same endpoint to enter Partial Delivery.  Applications should
be extra careful, when using this functionality, to track EOR indicators.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-25 22:27:59 -07:00
Vlad Yasevich
d0cf0d9940 [SCTP]: Do not interleave non-fragments when in partial delivery
The way partial delivery is currently implemnted, it is possible to
intereleave a message (either from another steram, or unordered) that
is not part of partial delivery process.  The only way to this is for
a message to not be a fragment and be 'in order' or unorderd for a
given stream.  This will result in bypassing the reassembly/ordering
queues where things live duing partial delivery, and the
message will be delivered to the socket in the middle of partial delivery.

This is a two-fold problem, in that:
1.  the app now must check the stream-id and flags which it may not
be doing.
2.  this clearing partial delivery state from the association and results
in ulp hanging.

This patch is a band-aid over a much bigger problem in that we
don't do stream interleave.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-04-18 14:16:09 -07:00
Vlad Yasevich
0b58a81146 [SCTP]: Clean up stale data during association restart
During association restart we may have stale data sitting
on the ULP queue waiting for ordering or reassembly.  This
data may cause severe problems if not cleaned up.  In particular
stale data pending ordering may cause problems with receive
window exhaustion if our peer has decided to restart the
association.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-03-20 00:09:43 -07:00
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
d808ad9ab8 [NET] SCTP: Fix whitespace errors.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-02-10 23:20:11 -08:00
Vlad Yasevich
331c4ee7fa [SCTP]: Fix receive buffer accounting.
When doing receiver buffer accounting, we always used skb->truesize.
This is problematic when processing bundled DATA chunks because for
every DATA chunk that could be small part of one large skb, we would
charge the size of the entire skb.  The new approach is to store the
size of the DATA chunk we are accounting for in the sctp_ulpevent
structure and use that stored value for accounting.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-10-11 23:59:44 -07:00
Vladislav Yasevich
672e7cca17 [SCTP]: Prevent possible infinite recursion with multiple bundled DATA.
There is a rare situation that causes lksctp to go into infinite recursion
and crash the system.  The trigger is a packet that contains at least the
first two DATA fragments of a message bundled together. The recursion is
triggered when the user data buffer is smaller that the full data message.
The problem is that we clone the skb for every fragment in the message.
When reassembling the full message, we try to link skbs from the "first
fragment" clone using the frag_list. However, since the frag_list is shared
between two clones in this rare situation, we end up setting the frag_list
pointer of the second fragment to point to itself.  This causes
sctp_skb_pull() to potentially recurse indefinitely.

Proposed solution is to make a copy of the skb when attempting to link
things using frag_list.

Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vladsilav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-05-05 17:03:49 -07:00
Al Viro
dd0fc66fb3 [PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1
- added typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t;

 - replaced __nocast uses for gfp flags with gfp_t - it gives exactly
   the same warnings as far as sparse is concerned, doesn't change
   generated code (from gcc point of view we replaced unsigned int with
   typedef) and documents what's going on far better.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-08 15:00:57 -07:00
David S. Miller
8728b834b2 [NET]: Kill skb->list
Remove the "list" member of struct sk_buff, as it is entirely
redundant.  All SKB list removal callers know which list the
SKB is on, so storing this in sk_buff does nothing other than
taking up some space.

Two tricky bits were SCTP, which I took care of, and two ATM
drivers which Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> fixed
up.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
2005-08-29 15:31:14 -07:00
Alexey Dobriyan
3182cd84f0 [SCTP]: __nocast annotations
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-07-11 20:57:47 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00