code to prepare for an upcoming mod which will introduce multi-level
in-core extent allocations. Although the in-core extent management is
using a new code path in this mod, the functionality remains the same.
Major changes include: - Introduce 10 new subroutines which re-orgainze
the existing code but do NOT change functionality:
xfs_iext_get_ext() xfs_iext_insert() xfs_iext_add()
xfs_iext_remove() xfs_iext_remove_inline()
xfs_iext_remove_direct() xfs_iext_realloc_direct()
xfs_iext_direct_to_inline() xfs_iext_inline_to_direct()
xfs_iext_destroy() - Remove 2 subroutines (functionality moved to new
subroutines above): xfs_iext_realloc() -replaced by xfs_iext_add()
and xfs_iext_remove() xfs_bmap_insert_exlist() - replaced by
xfs_iext_insert() xfs_bmap_delete_exlist() - replaced by
xfs_iext_remove() - Replace all hard-coded (indexed) extent assignments
with a call to xfs_iext_get_ext() - Replace all extent record pointer
arithmetic (ep++, ep--, base + lastx,..) with calls to
xfs_iext_get_ext() - Update comments to remove the idea of a single
"extent list" and introduce "extent record" terminology instead
SGI-PV: 928864
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:207390a
Signed-off-by: Mandy Kirkconnell <alkirkco@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
regressed recently via the fix for inherited quota inode attributes.
SGI-PV: 947312
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25318a
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
This patch switches XFS over to use the new mutex code directly as
opposed to the previous workaround patch I posted earlier that avoided
the namespace clash by forcing it back to semaphores. This falls in the
'works for me<tm>' category.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
having previously mounted with quotas.
SGI-PV: 940491
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23388a
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
