Lock sections don't work the new dwarf2 unwinder
This generates slightly smaller code. It adds one more taken
jump to the fast path.
Also move the trampolines into semaphore.S and add proper CFI
annotations.
Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Use "+m" rather than a combination of "=m" and "m" for improved clarity
and consistency.
This also fixes some inlines that incorrectly didn't tell the compiler
that they read the old value at all, potentially causing the compiler to
generate bogus code. It appear that all of those potential bugs were
hidden by the use of extra "volatile" specifiers on the data structures
in question, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Use the lock validator framework to prove rwsem locking correctness.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Add sem_is_read/write_locked functions to the read/write semaphores, along the
same lines of the *_is_locked spinlock functions. The swap token tuning patch
uses sem_is_read_locked; sem_is_write_locked is added for completeness.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
