Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Russell King
a09e64fbc0 [ARM] Move include/asm-arm/arch-* to arch/arm/*/include/mach
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-07 09:55:48 +01:00
Russell King
be50972935 [ARM] Remove asm/hardware.h, use asm/arch/hardware.h instead
Remove includes of asm/hardware.h in addition to asm/arch/hardware.h.
Then, since asm/hardware.h only exists to include asm/arch/hardware.h,
update everything to directly include asm/arch/hardware.h and remove
asm/hardware.h.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-07 09:40:08 +01:00
Robert Jarzmik
649de51b88 [ARM] 5027/1: Fixed random memory corruption on pxa suspend cycle.
Each time a pxa type cpu went in suspend, a portion of
kmalloc memory was corrupted.
The issue was an incorrect length allocation introduced by
the commit 711be5ccfe for
the save registers array (=> overflow).

Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <rjarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-05-04 11:06:05 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
26398a70ea PM: Rename struct pm_ops and related things
The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power
management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend.   Moreover,
its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems
reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.   In that case, the
name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of
related functions should be changed accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18 14:37:18 -07:00
Russell King
f3ebbc20ab [ARM] sa1100: stop doing our own rtc management over suspend
Remove the RTC management over a suspend/resume cycle.  As per the
corresponding PXA patch, the RTC library code handles updating
system time on resume.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-12 21:29:06 +01:00
Johannes Berg
e8c9c50269 power management: implement pm_ops.valid for everybody
Almost all users of pm_ops only support mem sleep, don't check in .valid and
don't reject any others in .prepare so users can be confused if they check
/sys/power/state, especially when new states are added (these would then
result in s-t-r although they're supposed to be something different).

This patch implements a generic pm_valid_only_mem function that is then
exported for users and puts it to use in almost all existing pm_ops.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-30 16:40:40 -07:00
Johannes Berg
fe0c935a6c rework pm_ops pm_disk_mode, kill misuse
This patch series cleans up some misconceptions about pm_ops.  Some users of
the pm_ops structure attempt to use it to stop the user from entering suspend
to disk, this, however, is not possible since the user can always use
"shutdown" in /sys/power/disk and then the pm_ops are never invoked.  Also,
platforms that don't support suspend to disk simply should not allow
configuring SOFTWARE_SUSPEND (read the help text on it, it only selects
suspend to disk and nothing else, all the other stuff depends on PM).

The pm_ops structure is actually intended to provide a way to enter
platform-defined sleep states (currently supported states are "standby" and
"mem" (suspend to ram)) and additionally (if SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is configured)
allows a platform to support a platform specific way to enter low-power mode
once everything has been saved to disk.  This is currently only used by ACPI
(S4).

This patch:

The pm_ops.pm_disk_mode is used in totally bogus ways since nobody really
seems to understand what it actually does.

This patch clarifies the pm_disk_mode description.

It also removes all the arm and sh users that think they can veto suspend to
disk via pm_ops; not so since the user can always do echo shutdown >
/sys/power/disk, they need to find a better way involving Kconfig or such.

ACPI is the only user left with a non-zero pm_disk_mode.

The patch also sets the default mode to shutdown again, but when a new pm_ops
is registered its pm_disk_mode is selected as default, that way the default
stays for ACPI where it is apparently required.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-30 16:40:40 -07:00
Russell King
b3a962455b [ARM] Remove SA1100 PM prepare/finish ops
These are empty, unnecessary functions, so remove them.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-01-04 15:55:41 +00:00
Russell King
36c5ed23b9 [PATCH] ARM SMP: Fix PXA/SA11x0 suspend resume crash
We need to re-initialise the stack pointers for undefined, IRQ
and abort mode handlers whenever we resume.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-19 18:39:33 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00