Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof Helt
5fec811e99 [SPARC]: Small smp cleanup.
It moves the smp_procesors_ready variable to sun4d_smp.c only.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt (krzysztof.h1@wp.pl)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-08-26 17:52:56 -07:00
Raymond Burns
8b3c848cc8 [SPARC]: Get sun4d SMP building again.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-07-21 14:18:20 -07:00
Bob Breuer
92d452f0eb [SPARC]: Mark smp init functions as cpuinit
Fix the smp related section mismatch warnings by marking the smp init
functions as cpuinit.

Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-20 00:36:10 -07:00
Bob Breuer
7202fb496a [SPARC]: Setup cpu_possible_map
Setup cpu_possible_map so the secondary cpus will get started.

Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-20 00:30:31 -07:00
Krzysztof Helt
650fb83822 [SPARC]: Migration cost tune up in sparc smp.
This patch sets the max_cache_size value required to tune up
scheduler in SMP systems. Otherwise, the calculated
migration_cost is too high and task scheduling may lock up.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-06-10 22:03:43 -07:00
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
fff8efe7b7 [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu: sparc
for_each_cpu() actually iterates across all possible CPUs.  We've had mistakes
in the past where people were using for_each_cpu() where they should have been
iterating across only online or present CPUs.  This is inefficient and
possibly buggy.

We're renaming for_each_cpu() to for_each_possible_cpu() to avoid this in the
future.

This patch replaces for_each_cpu with for_each_possible_cpu.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-04-11 06:18:31 -07:00
Bob Breuer
a54123e277 [SPARC]: Try to start getting SMP back into shape.
Todo items:
 - IRQ_INPROGRESS flag - use sparc64 irq buckets, or generic irq_desc?
 - sun4d
 - re-indent large chunks of sun4m_smp.c
 - some places assume sequential cpu numbering (i.e. 0,1 instead of 0,2)

Last I checked (with 2.6.14), random programs segfault with dual
HyperSPARC.  And with SuperSPARC II's, it seems stable but will
eventually die from a write lock error (wrong lock owner or something).

I haven't tried the HyperSPARC + highmem combination recently, so that
may still be a problem.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-03-23 22:36:19 -08:00
Andrew Morton
394e3902c5 [PATCH] more for_each_cpu() conversions
When we stop allocating percpu memory for not-possible CPUs we must not touch
the percpu data for not-possible CPUs at all.  The correct way of doing this
is to test cpu_possible() or to use for_each_cpu().

This patch is a kernel-wide sweep of all instances of NR_CPUS.  I found very
few instances of this bug, if any.  But the patch converts lots of open-coded
test to use the preferred helper macros.

Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Christian Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Philippe Elie <phil.el@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-23 07:38:17 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00