Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mahesh Salgaonkar
43714539ea sched: don't export sched_mc_power_savings in laptops
Impact: do not expose a control that has no effect

Fix to prevent sched_mc_power_saving from being exported through sysfs
on single-socket systems. (Say multicore single socket (Laptop))

CPU core map of the boot cpu should be equal to possible number
of cpus for single socket system.

This fix has been developed at FOSS.in kernel workout.

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-01 08:44:00 +01:00
Ingo Molnar
9fcd18c9e6 sched: re-tune balancing
Impact: improve wakeup affinity on NUMA systems, tweak SMP systems

Given the fixes+tweaks to the wakeup-buddy code, re-tweak the domain
balancing defaults on NUMA and SMP systems.

Turn on SD_WAKE_AFFINE which was off on x86 NUMA - there's no reason
why we would not want to have wakeup affinity across nodes as well.
(we already do this in the standard NUMA template.)

lat_ctx on a NUMA box is particularly happy about this change:

before:

 |   phoenix:~/l> ./lat_ctx -s 0 2
 |   "size=0k ovr=2.60
 |   2 5.70

after:

 |   phoenix:~/l> ./lat_ctx -s 0 2
 |   "size=0k ovr=2.65
 |   2 2.07

a 2.75x speedup.

pipe-test is similarly happy about it too:

 |  phoenix:~/sched-tests> ./pipe-test
 |   18.26 usecs/loop.
 |   14.70 usecs/loop.
 |   14.38 usecs/loop.
 |   10.55 usecs/loop.              # +WAKE_AFFINE on domain0+domain1
 |   8.63 usecs/loop.
 |   8.59 usecs/loop.
 |   9.03 usecs/loop.
 |   8.94 usecs/loop.
 |   8.96 usecs/loop.
 |   8.63 usecs/loop.

Also:

 - disable SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE on NUMA and SMP domains (keep it for siblings)
 - enable SD_WAKE_BALANCE on SMP domains

Sysbench+postgresql improves all around the board, quite significantly:

           .28-rc3-11474e2c  .28-rc3-11474e2c-tune
-------------------------------------------------
    1:             571              688    +17.08%
    2:            1236             1206    -2.55%
    4:            2381             2642    +9.89%
    8:            4958             5164    +3.99%
   16:            9580             9574    -0.07%
   32:            7128             8118    +12.20%
   64:            7342             8266    +11.18%
  128:            7342             8064    +8.95%
  256:            7519             7884    +4.62%
  512:            7350             7731    +4.93%
-------------------------------------------------
  SUM:           55412            59341    +6.62%

So it's a win both for the runup portion, the peak area and the tail.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-05 18:04:38 +01:00
H. Peter Anvin
1965aae3c9 x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:23 -07:00
Al Viro
bb8985586b x86, um: ... and asm-x86 move
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:20 -07:00