Alan Stern wrote:
> If the device sometimes reports the correct values, then you should
> include NEED_OVERRIDE flag to prevent messages about unnecessary
> overrides showing up in the system log. Also, if bInterfaceSubclass
> is correct and only bInterfaceProtocol is wrong, then the entry should
> say US_SC_DEVICE instead of US_SC_SCSI.
Fair points, thanks.
When connected over USB2, this device reports a nonsense
bInterfaceProtocol value 6 and doesn't work with usb-storage. When
connected over USB1, the device reports the correct bInterfaceProtocol
value 0x50 (bulk) and works with no problems.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch adds entries for several USB floppies that need
the US_FL_SINGLE_LUN flag. These were reported by
Sebastian Kapfer <sebastian_kapfer@gmx.net> and Olaf Hering
<olh@suse.de>, with rediffing and cleaning from me.
Reported-by: Sebastian Kapfer <sebastian_kapfer@gmx.net>
Reported-by: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
The stick replies to the door lock commands with a check condition (e.g.
FAIL status in a normal bulk CSW), but the subsequent REQUEST SENSE
returns all-zero sense. The situation is documented in our Bugzilla,
including usbmon traces.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162559
The error is purely cosmetic, data integrity is not in danger.
But I thought we might as well do it. It looks nicer that way.
I discussed this with Phil and he told me to submit directly.
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch is originally from Nick Sillik, and has been rediffed against
the latest tree.
This patch adds usability to the OneTouch Button on Maxtor External USB
Hard Drives. Using an unusual device entry it declares an extra init
function which claims the interrupt endpoint associated with this
button. The button is connected to the input system.
Signed-off-by: Nick Sillik <n.sillik@temple.edu>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch adds an entry in the unusual_devs.h file for a Mitsumi card
reader/floppy combo that uses a VIA chipset. The IGNORE_RESIDUE flag was
needed for the second LUN to operate properly.
Signed-off-by: Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea@zulu.ro>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch removes an unneeded subclass and protocol from the
07af/0005/100 entry in unsual_devs.h as reported by Alfred Ganz
<alfred-ganz@agci.com>.
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
The original entry of this patch was submitted by Filippo Bardelli
<filibard@libero.it>, with cleanups and patch-ification by me.
This corrects the subclass that the device reports.
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch adds an unusual_devs entry for the Minolta Dimage Z10.
Originally reported by Vilisas <vilisas@xxx.lt>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> 1. You're adding product IDs 1202, 1203, 1204, and 1205. 1203 was
> already there, but you remove it, OK, but 1205 is already there, so
> you'll need to fix that.
I was not removing 1203, it's just the extension of the bcd range. You are
right about 1205, as I wrote, it was a patch against 2.6.11.7. Attached is
a patch against 2.6.12-rc2.
> 2. I'm OK with the full bcd range if Apple is changing it on firmware
> revs... fine, but it's bcd, not hex... 0x9999 =)
I just copied from other entries. There're a lot 0xffffs in unusual_dev.h,
so I assumed it is correct. I changed it to 0x9999.
> 3. It's rather obnoxious to take the original submitter's credit away.
I didn't remove it, I changed it to "based on...". Because I changed
something (the range) in his entry, I thought it is the best to take the
responsibility but keep the origin. Anyway, in the new patch I did it in a
different way.
> 4. Your /proc/bus/usb/devices shows 1204, but I see no evidence 1202 is
> really an iPod.
I don't have an old iPod mini, but you find a lot of evidence here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=0x1202+ipod
Especially this one:
http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdescr.php?id=2737
> It also looks like 1205's entry is getting mangled, but I haven't
> attempted to apply the patch, so I'm not sure.
No, the patch was ok, but I agree it looks strange. It's not very
readable, because I cannot tell diff to work blockwise instead of
linewise. Because of the similarity of the entries, diff splits and merges
them. Anyway, the new patch "looks" better. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Sven Anderson <sven-linux@anderson.de>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
