David Howells d1c6d2e547 MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt() ... Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than in_interrupt() as commit 6edaf68a87 did for other architectures: Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800 [PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic() In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected. Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user) rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt count. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>		2008-09-11 10:36:08 -07:00
..
boot	inflate: refactor inflate malloc code	2008-07-25 10:53:28 -07:00
configs	MN10300: Update asb2303_defconfig	2008-02-19 15:51:36 -08:00
kernel	removed unused #include <linux/version.h>'s	2008-08-23 12:14:12 -07:00
lib	mn10300: provide __ucmpdi2() for MN10300	2008-07-04 10:40:07 -07:00
mm	MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt()	2008-09-11 10:36:08 -07:00
oprofile
proc-mn103e010
unit-asb2303
unit-asb2305	iomap: fix 64 bits resources on 32 bits	2008-04-29 08:06:02 -07:00
Kconfig	BKL: revert back to the old spinlock implementation	2008-05-10 20:58:02 -07:00
Kconfig.debug
Makefile