Julia Lawall e2e0c7c9dd net/rose: Use GFP_ATOMIC ... The other calls to kmalloc in the same function use GFP_ATOMIC, and indeed two locks are held within the body of the function. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ identifier f; @@ *f(...,GFP_ATOMIC,...) ... when != spin_unlock(...) when != read_unlock(...) when != write_unlock(...) when != read_unlock_irq(...) when != write_unlock_irq(...) when != read_unlock_irqrestore(...) when != write_unlock_irqrestore(...) when != spin_unlock_irq(...) when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(...) *f(...,GFP_KERNEL,...) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2010-08-01 00:32:12 -07:00
..
af_rose.c	net: sk_sleep() helper	2010-04-20 16:37:13 -07:00
Makefile
rose_dev.c	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h	2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
rose_in.c
rose_link.c	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h	2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
rose_loopback.c	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h	2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
rose_out.c	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h	2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
rose_route.c	net/rose: Use GFP_ATOMIC	2010-08-01 00:32:12 -07:00
rose_subr.c	include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h	2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
rose_timer.c
sysctl_net_rose.c