David Howells d1c6d2e547 MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt() ... Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than in_interrupt() as commit 6edaf68a87 did for other architectures: Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800 [PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic() In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected. Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user) rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt count. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>		2008-09-11 10:36:08 -07:00
..
cache-flush-mn10300.S
cache-mn10300.S
cache.c
dma-alloc.c
extable.c
fault.c	MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt()	2008-09-11 10:36:08 -07:00
init.c
Makefile
misalignment.c
mmu-context.c
pgtable.c	mn10300: use generic show_mem()	2008-07-26 12:00:11 -07:00
tlb-mn10300.S