From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Neil said:
> At the end of ops_run_compute5 you have:
> /* ack now if postxor is not set to be run */
> if (tx && !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &s->ops_run))
> async_tx_ack(tx);
>
> It looks odd having that test there. Would it fit in raid5_run_ops
> better?
The intended global interpretation is that raid5_run_ops can build a chain
of xor and memcpy operations. When MD registers the compute-xor it tells
async_tx to keep the operation handle around so that another item in the
dependency chain can be submitted. If we are just computing a block to
satisfy a read then we can terminate the chain immediately. raid5_run_ops
gives a better context for this test since it cares about the entire chain.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
7b3a871ed9