mirror of
				https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git
				synced 2025-10-30 20:40:28 -04:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
	
	
		
			253 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			253 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
|  | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" | ||
|  | "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | <html> | ||
|  | <head> | ||
|  |   <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us"> | ||
|  |   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> | ||
|  |   <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../../../boost.css"> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <title>Checking policies</title> | ||
|  | </head> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | <body> | ||
|  |   <h1>Checking policies</h1> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>A checking policy controls how the <code>interval</code> class will deal | ||
|  |   with special cases like: empty intervals, infinite numbers, invalid | ||
|  |   values.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>For example, let's consider <code>operator+(interval, T)</code>. The | ||
|  |   second argument could be an invalid value (for a floating-point number, it | ||
|  |   is a NaN). What to do in such a case? First, we could say that the second | ||
|  |   argument can never be an invalid number. Second, we could also say such a | ||
|  |   situation can arise but is forbidden. Third, we could allow such values and | ||
|  |   generate an empty interval when encountered. And there is many other | ||
|  |   possibilities.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>It is the reason why such a policy is used: there is a lot of | ||
|  |   interesting behaviors and it would be sad to arbitrarily select one of | ||
|  |   these.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <h2>Requirements</h2> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>The checking class should satisfy the following requirement (in the form | ||
|  |   of an interface):</p> | ||
|  |   <pre> | ||
|  | /* requirements for checking policy */ | ||
|  | struct checking | ||
|  | { | ||
|  |   static T pos_inf(); | ||
|  |   static T neg_inf(); | ||
|  |   static T nan(); | ||
|  |   static bool is_nan(const T&); | ||
|  |   static T empty_lower(); | ||
|  |   static T empty_upper(); | ||
|  |   static bool is_empty(const T&, const T&); | ||
|  | }; | ||
|  | </pre> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>The first two functions, <code>pos_inf</code> and <code>neg_inf</code>, | ||
|  |   are invoked each time the library has to create the infinite bound of an | ||
|  |   interval. For example, <code>interval::whole</code> computes | ||
|  |   <code>interval(checking::neg_inf(), checking::pos_inf())</code>. If | ||
|  |   infinite values are allowed and | ||
|  |   <code>std::numeric_limits<T>::infinity()</code> returns a correct | ||
|  |   value, such a value can be used.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>Next comes <code>nan</code>. This function is used each time a function | ||
|  |   need to return a value of type <code>T</code> but is unable to compute it. | ||
|  |   It only happens when one of the arguments of the function is invalid. For | ||
|  |   example, if you ask what the median value of an empty interval is, | ||
|  |   <code>nan</code> will be used. But please remember: <code>lower</code> and | ||
|  |   <code>upper</code> directly return the value stocked in the interval; so, | ||
|  |   if the interval is empty, <code>lower</code> will not answer | ||
|  |   <code>by</code> a call to <code>checking::nan</code> (but will return the | ||
|  |   same value than <code>checking::empty_lower</code> could return).</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><code>empty_lower</code> and <code>empty_upper</code> respectively | ||
|  |   return the lower and upper bound of the empty interval. There is no | ||
|  |   requirements for <code>empty_lower</code> and <code>empty_upper</code> to | ||
|  |   return the same value than <code>checking::nan</code>. For example, if the | ||
|  |   type <code>T</code> does not have any invalid value, the | ||
|  |   <code>empty_</code> functions can return the [1;0] interval.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><code>is_nan</code> is used to test if a value of type <code>T</code> is | ||
|  |   invalid or not. <code>is_empty</code> tests if the interval formed by the | ||
|  |   two arguments is empty or not. Such tests will generally be at the | ||
|  |   beginning of each function which involves an argument of type | ||
|  |   <code>T</code>. If one of the inputs is declared invalid, the the function | ||
|  |   will try to produce an invalid value or an input interval.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <h2>Synopsis</h2> | ||
|  |   <pre> | ||
|  | namespace boost { | ||
|  | namespace numeric { | ||
|  | namespace interval_lib { | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | template<class T> | ||
|  | struct checking_base; | ||
|  | template<class T, class Checking = checking_base<T>, class Exception = exception_create_empty<T> > | ||
|  | struct checking_no_empty; | ||
|  | template<class T, class Checking = checking_base<T> > | ||
|  | struct checking_no_nan; | ||
|  | template<class T, class Checking = checking_base<T>, class Exception = exception_invalid_number<T> > | ||
|  | struct checking_catch_nan; | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | template<class T> struct exception_create_empty { T operator()(); }; | ||
|  | template<class T> struct exception_invalid_number { void operator()(); }; | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | } // namespace numeric | ||
|  | } // namespace interval_lib | ||
|  | } // namespace boost | ||
|  | </pre> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <h2>Predefined classes</h2> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>In order to simplify the customization of the policy, some templates are | ||
|  |   already defined in the library.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>First of all, there is <code>checking_base</code>. Thanks to the | ||
|  |   information provided by <code>std::numeric_limits<T></code>, this | ||
|  |   class is able to generate a base for the policy. If <code>T</code> has | ||
|  |   quiet NaNs (as said by <code>numeric_limits::has_quiet_NaN</code>), then | ||
|  |   the value is used for <code>nan</code>, <code>empty_lower</code>, | ||
|  |   <code>empty_upper</code>; and a basic test is used for <code>is_nan</code> | ||
|  |   (it is <code>x!=x</code>). If <code>T</code> does not have quiet NaNs, then | ||
|  |   <code>nan</code> is an <code>assert(false)</code>, the empty interval is | ||
|  |   [1,0], and <code>is_nan</code> always return <code>false</code>. As for | ||
|  |   <code>nan</code>, <code>pos_inf</code> returns | ||
|  |   <code>numeric_limits::infinity()</code> if possible, or is an | ||
|  |   <code>assert(false</code>) otherwise. <code>neg_inf</code> returns the | ||
|  |   opposite. Finally, <code>is_empty(T l,T u)</code> is always defined by | ||
|  |   <code>!(l<=u)</code>.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>Next comes <code>checking_no_empty</code>. Using it means that each time | ||
|  |   an empty interval should be produced (by <code>empty_lower</code> and | ||
|  |   <code>empty_upper</code>), the function object given by the | ||
|  |   <code>Exception</code> argument of the template is invoked and the value it | ||
|  |   returns is propagated. So, if <code>Exception</code> is appropriately | ||
|  |   defined (for example it could throw an exception, hence the name of the | ||
|  |   argument), you can be sure no empty interval will ever be created. So | ||
|  |   <code>is_empty</code> will always return <code>false</code> (since there is | ||
|  |   no need to test for an empty interval). And as explained before, in that | ||
|  |   case we can also replace <code>nan</code> by an <code>assert(false)</code>; | ||
|  |   you will be sure no invalid number will ever be produced. If this template | ||
|  |   is not used, it implicitly means that all the functions can produce empty | ||
|  |   intervals and they correctly deal with empty interval arguments.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>Finally there are <code>checking_no_nan</code> and | ||
|  |   <code>checking_catch_nan</code>. The first one expresses the functions of | ||
|  |   the library will never get an invalid number as argument. So | ||
|  |   <code>is_nan</code> will only return <code>false</code>. The other one | ||
|  |   means the arguments can be an invalid number but in that case, | ||
|  |   <code>is_nan</code> will call the function object <code>Exception</code> | ||
|  |   and return <code>false</code>. Indeed, this template means invalid numbers | ||
|  |   should never make their way through to the body of the function. If none of | ||
|  |   this two templates is used, it implicitly means that all the functions can | ||
|  |   get invalid number arguments and they will correctly deal with them.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><code>exception_create_empty</code> throws | ||
|  |   <code>std::runtime_error</code> with the message <code>"boost::interval: | ||
|  |   empty interval created"</code> and <code>exception_invalid_number</code> | ||
|  |   throws <code>std::invalid_argument</code> with the message | ||
|  |   <code>"boost::interval: invalid number"</code>.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <h2>Customizing your own checking policy</h2> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>In order to define a suitable policy, you need to correctly say what you | ||
|  |   expect from your interval class. First of all, are you interested in | ||
|  |   getting empty intervals at the end of a calculus? If you do not want to | ||
|  |   obtain empty intervals, <code>empty_lower</code> and | ||
|  |   <code>empty_upper</code> have to fail when invoked (they can throw an | ||
|  |   exception, set a flag, etc). However, if no function is able to produce an | ||
|  |   empty interval, it is no more necessary to do the test, so | ||
|  |   <code>is_empty</code> may always return <code>false</code>. In this case, a | ||
|  |   good compiler will do a lot of optimizations.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>You could also be interested in getting empty intervals at the end of | ||
|  |   the calculus. For example, if you need to transform an array of unsure | ||
|  |   values (or intervals) in a new array of intervals, you may not want to stop | ||
|  |   the conversion at the first encountered problem. So | ||
|  |   <code>empty_lower</code> and <code>empty_upper</code> need to return | ||
|  |   suitable values in order to define an empty interval (you can use an upper | ||
|  |   bound which is not greater or equal than the lower bound for example); and | ||
|  |   <code>is_empty</code> must be able to distinguish empty intervals from the | ||
|  |   valid intervals.</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>Another important question is: is it possible that some base numbers | ||
|  |   (objects of type <code>T</code>) are invalid? And if it is possible, are | ||
|  |   they allowed or not ? If it is not possible, no test is necessary; | ||
|  |   <code>is_nan</code> may always return <code>false</code>. In this case too, | ||
|  |   a good compiler will do a lot of optimizations. If function arguments can | ||
|  |   hold invalid numbers, two cases must be considered according to whether | ||
|  |   they are allowed or not. If they are allowed, <code>is_nan</code> just has | ||
|  |   to test if they are invalid or not. If they are forbidden, | ||
|  |   <code>is_nan</code> should fail (exception, assert, etc.) when invoked on | ||
|  |   an invalid argument and return <code>false</code> otherwise. The value | ||
|  |   returned by <code>nan</code> does not have any interest since the interval | ||
|  |   functions are guaranteed not to produce invalid interval bounds unless the | ||
|  |   user passes invalid numbers to the constructors. So you can put an assert | ||
|  |   inside if you do not trust the library. :-)</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>And finally, you need to decide what to do with <code>nan</code> if it | ||
|  |   has not already been decided at the beginning, and with | ||
|  |   <code>pos_inf</code> and <code>neg_inf</code>. These functions should | ||
|  |   return a value or start an exceptional behavior (especially if the base | ||
|  |   type does not have corresponding values).</p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <h2>Some examples</h2> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <ul> | ||
|  |     <li>If you need a checking policy that allows the library to correctly | ||
|  |     manipulate data, even if they contain invalid numbers and empty | ||
|  |     intervals, then <code>checking_base<T></code> is a | ||
|  |     possibility.</li> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     <li>If you do not want empty intervals to be created and are not sure all | ||
|  |     the numbers are valid, then <code>checking_catch_nan<T, | ||
|  |     checking_no_empty<T> ></code> can help you.</li> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     <li>If all the numbers will be valid and if no empty interval is supposed | ||
|  |     to be created (or if you do not want them to be created), then you can | ||
|  |     use <code>checking_no_nan<T, checking_no_empty<T> ></code>. | ||
|  |     Please note that if <code>T</code> does not have a way to represent | ||
|  |     invalid numbers, then this policy will behave the same way as | ||
|  |     <code>checking_no_empty<T></code>. This is the default policy and | ||
|  |     it is also called <code>interval_lib::checking_strict</code>.</li> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     <li>If all numerical data are valid but the algorithm can produce and | ||
|  |     manipulate empty intervals, then <code>checking_no_nan<T></code> | ||
|  |     should be used.</li> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     <li>Similarly, if invalid data have to be signaled and the algorithm can | ||
|  |     manipulate empty intervals, the <code>checking_catch_nan<T></code> | ||
|  |     is a solution.</li> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     <li>If you do not mind having undefined results when an empty interval or | ||
|  |     an interval number is produced, your best bet is to create your own | ||
|  |     policy by overloading <code>checking_base</code> and modifying | ||
|  |     <code>is_nan</code> et <code>is_empty</code> in order for them to always | ||
|  |     return <code>false</code>. It is probably the fastest checking policy | ||
|  |     available; however, it suffers from its deficient security.</li> | ||
|  |   </ul> | ||
|  |   <hr> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img border="0" src= | ||
|  |   "../../../../doc/images/valid-html401.png" alt="Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional" | ||
|  |   height="31" width="88"></a></p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p>Revised  | ||
|  |   <!--webbot bot="Timestamp" s-type="EDITED" s-format="%Y-%m-%d" startspan -->2006-12-24<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="12172" --></p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><i>Copyright © 2002 Guillaume Melquiond, Sylvain Pion, Hervé | ||
|  |   Brönnimann, Polytechnic University<br> | ||
|  |   Copyright © 2003-2004 Guillaume Melquiond</i></p> | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |   <p><i>Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See | ||
|  |   accompanying file <a href="../../../../LICENSE_1_0.txt">LICENSE_1_0.txt</a> | ||
|  |   or copy at <a href= | ||
|  |   "http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt">http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt</a>)</i></p> | ||
|  | </body> | ||
|  | </html> |