mirror of
				https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git
				synced 2025-10-31 04:50:34 -04:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
	
	
		
			123 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			123 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
|  | [section:float_comparison Floating-point Comparison] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [import ../../example/float_comparison_example.cpp] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Comparison of floating-point values has always been a source of endless difficulty and confusion. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Unlike integral values that are exact, all floating-point operations | ||
|  | will potentially produce an inexact result that will be rounded to the nearest | ||
|  | available binary representation.  Even apparently inocuous operations such as assigning | ||
|  | 0.1 to a double produces an inexact result (as this decimal number has no | ||
|  | exact binary representation). | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Floating-point computations also involve rounding so that some 'computational noise' is added, | ||
|  | and hence results are also not exact (although repeatable, at least under identical platforms and compile options). | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Sadly, this conflicts with the expectation of most users, as many articles and innumerable cries for help show all too well. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Some background reading is: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | * Knuth D.E. The art of computer programming, vol II, section 4.2, especially Floating-Point Comparison 4.2.2, pages 198-220. | ||
|  | * [@http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html David Goldberg, "What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic"] | ||
|  | * [@http://adtmag.com/articles/2000/03/16/comparing-floatshow-to-determine-if-floating-quantities-are-close-enough-once-a-tolerance-has-been-r.aspx | ||
|  | Alberto Squassabia, Comparing floats listing] | ||
|  | * [@https://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/AdvancedGuide#Floating-Point_Comparison Google Floating-Point_Comparison guide] | ||
|  | * [@boost:/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/users_guide/testing_tools/testing_floating_points.html Boost.Test Floating-Point_Comparison] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Boost provides a number of ways to compare floating-point values to see if they are tolerably close enough to each other, | ||
|  | but first we must decide what kind of comparison we require: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | * Absolute difference/error: the absolute difference between two values ['a] and ['b] is simply `fabs(a-b)`. | ||
|  | This is the only meaningful comparison to make if we know that the result may have cancellation error (see below). | ||
|  | * The edit distance between the two values: i.e. how many (binary) floating-point values are between two values ['a] and ['b]? | ||
|  | This is provided by the function __float_distance, but is probably only useful when you know that the distance should be very small. | ||
|  | This function is somewhat difficult to compute, and doesn't scale to values that are very far apart.  In other words, use with care. | ||
|  | * The relative distance/error between two values.  This is quick and easy to compute, and is generally the method of choice when | ||
|  | checking that your results are "tolerably close" to one another.  However, it is not as exact as the edit distance when dealing | ||
|  | with small differences, and due to the way floating-point values are encoded can "wobble" by a factor of 2 compared to the "true" | ||
|  | edit distance.  This is the method documented below: if `float_distance` is a surgeon's scalpel, then `relative_difference` is more | ||
|  | like a Swiss army knife: both have important but different use cases. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [h5:fp_relative Relative Comparison of Floating-point Values] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | `#include <boost/math/special_functions/relative_difference.hpp>` | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |    template <class T, class U> | ||
|  |    ``__sf_result`` relative_difference(T a, U b); | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |    template <class T, class U> | ||
|  |    ``__sf_result`` epsilon_difference(T a, U b); | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The function `relative_difference` returns the relative distance/error ['E] between two values as defined by: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [pre E = fabs((a - b) / min(a,b))] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The function `epsilon_difference` is a convenience function that returns `relative_difference(a, b) / eps` where | ||
|  | `eps` is the machine epsilon for the result type. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The following special cases are handled as follows: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | * If either of ['a] or ['b] is a NaN, then returns the largest representable value for T: for example for type `double`, this | ||
|  | is `std::numeric_limits<double>::max()` which is the same as `DBL_MAX` or `1.7976931348623157e+308`. | ||
|  | * If ['a] and ['b] differ in sign then returns the largest representable value for T. | ||
|  | * If both ['a] and ['b] are both infinities (of the same sign), then returns zero. | ||
|  | * If just one of ['a] and ['b] is an infinity, then returns the largest representable value for T. | ||
|  | * If both ['a] and ['b] are zero then returns zero. | ||
|  | * If just one of ['a] or ['b] is a zero or a denormalized value, then it is treated as if it were the | ||
|  | smallest (non-denormalized) value representable in T for the purposes of the above calculation. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | These rules were primarily designed to assist with our own test suite, they are designed to be robust enough | ||
|  | that the function can in most cases be used blindly, including in cases where the expected result is actually | ||
|  | too small to represent in type T and underflows to zero. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [h5 Examples] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [compare_floats_using] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_1] | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_2] | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_3] | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_4] | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_5] | ||
|  | [compare_floats_example_6] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | All the above examples are contained in [@../../example/float_comparison_example.cpp float_comparison_example.cpp]. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [h5:small Handling Absolute Errors] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Imagine we're testing the following function: | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |    double myspecial(double x) | ||
|  |    { | ||
|  |       return sin(x) - sin(4 * x); | ||
|  |    } | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This function has multiple roots, some of which are quite predicable in that both | ||
|  | `sin(x)` and `sin(4x)` are zero together.  Others occur because the values returned | ||
|  | from those two functions precisely cancel out.  At such points the relative difference | ||
|  | between the true value of the function and the actual value returned may be ['arbitrarily | ||
|  | large] due to [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_significance cancellation error]. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In such a case, testing the function above by requiring that the values returned by | ||
|  | `relative_error` or `epsilon_error` are below some threshold is pointless: the best | ||
|  | we can do is to verify that the ['absolute difference] between the true | ||
|  | and calculated values is below some threshold. | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Of course, determining what that threshold should be is often tricky, | ||
|  | but a good starting point would be machine epsilon multiplied by the largest | ||
|  | of the values being summed.  In the example above, the largest value returned | ||
|  | by `sin(whatever)` is 1, so simply using machine epsilon as the target for | ||
|  | maximum absolute difference might be a good start (though in practice we may need | ||
|  | a slightly higher value - some trial and error will be necessary). | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [endsect] [/section:float_comparison Floating-point comparison] | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | [/ | ||
|  |   Copyright 2015 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow. | ||
|  |   Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. | ||
|  |   (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at | ||
|  |   http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt). | ||
|  | ] |