w4kek/WSJT-X
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git synced 2024-11-15 16:42:12 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove extra word 'is' and add two sentences to tout the advantages of FST4-60 over JT9.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Steven Franke 2021-02-13 11:06:28 -06:00
parent dacd534284
commit 3f17882ab9
2 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
doc/user_guide/en/new_features.adoc
View File

@ -31,4 +31,9 @@ synchronization symbols.
for making 2-way QSOs, and FST4W should replace WSPR for propagation for making 2-way QSOs, and FST4W should replace WSPR for propagation
tests*. Operating conventions on these LF and MF bands will tests*. Operating conventions on these LF and MF bands will
eventually determine the most useful T/R sequence lengths for each eventually determine the most useful T/R sequence lengths for each
type of operation. type of operation. We also expect that the 60 second variant of FST4
(FST4-60) will outperform JT9 for DX QSOs on HF bands due, in part,
to the FST4 decoder's ability to use AP decoding for messages received
from a QSO partner. In addition, FST4 provides the added benefits
associated with 77-bit messages and auto-sequencing.

2
doc/user_guide/en/tutorial-example5.adoc
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Do not confuse FST4 with FT4, which has a very different purpose! Do not confuse FST4 with FT4, which has a very different purpose!
FST4 is is designed for making 2-way QSOs on the LF and MF bands. FST4 is designed primarily for making 2-way QSOs on the LF and MF bands.
Operation with FST4 is similar to that with other _WSJT-X_ modes: most Operation with FST4 is similar to that with other _WSJT-X_ modes: most
on-screen controls, auto-sequencing, and other features behave in on-screen controls, auto-sequencing, and other features behave in
familiar ways. However, operating conventions on the 2200 and 630 m familiar ways. However, operating conventions on the 2200 and 630 m