From b04a73e1575bfac4900373e363ba52180b456bd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Franke Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:43:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add discussion of sync losses. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx@6318 ab8295b8-cf94-4d9e-aec4-7959e3be5d79 --- lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/bmdata.dat | 12 ++++++------ lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/bmdata.dat b/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/bmdata.dat index 826277935..987bbbba1 100644 --- a/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/bmdata.dat +++ b/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/bmdata.dat @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -24.5 0.000 -24.0 0.006 --23.5 0.046 --23.0 0.250 --22.5 0.630 --22.0 0.900 --21.5 0.992 --21.0 0.99987 +-23.5 0.046 0.066 +-23.0 0.250 0.305 +-22.5 0.630 0.701 +-22.0 0.900 0.945 +-21.5 0.992 0.9974 +-21.0 0.99987 diff --git a/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx b/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx index 81a317846..24cb9605e 100644 --- a/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx +++ b/lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ In practice we find that \begin_inset Formula $p_{1}$ \end_inset -and + and \begin_inset Formula $p_{2}$ \end_inset @@ -1246,9 +1246,36 @@ reference "fig:bodide" also shows theoretical results (filled squares) for comparison with the BM results. The simulated BM results agree with theory to within about 0.1 dB. - As expected, the soft-decision algorithms FT and KV are about 2 dB better + This difference between simulated BM results and theory is caused by small + errors in the estimates of time- and frequency-offset of the received signal + in the simulated results. + Such +\begin_inset Quotes eld +\end_inset + +sync losses +\begin_inset Quotes erd +\end_inset + + are not accounted for in the idealized theoretical results. + +\end_layout + +\begin_layout Standard +As expected, the soft-decision algorithms, FT and KV, are about 2 dB better than the hard-decision BM algorithm. In addition, FT has a slight edge (about 0.2 dB) over KV. + On the other hand, the execution time for FT with +\begin_inset Formula $T=10^{5}$ +\end_inset + + is longer than the execution time for the KV algorithm. + Nevertheless, the execution time required for the FT algorithm with +\begin_inset Formula $T=10^{5}$ +\end_inset + + is small enough to be practical on most computers. + \end_layout \begin_layout Standard