w4kek
/
WSJT-X
mirror of https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Minor edits. 

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/branches/wsjtx@6355 ab8295b8-cf94-4d9e-aec4-7959e3be5d79
This commit is contained in:
Steven Franke 2016-01-06 02:03:26 +00:00
parent 8ba09d5175
commit b52e099326
1 changed files with 2343 additions and 2342 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
lib/ftrsd/ftrsd_paper/ftrsd.lyx
View File

@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ The FT algorithm uses quality indices made available by a noncoherent 64-FSK
\end_inset
of the symbol's fractional power
\begin_inset Formula $p_{1,\,j}$
\begin_inset Formula $p_{1,\, j}$
\end_inset
in a sorted list of
@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ t educated guesses to select symbols for erasure.
, the soft distance between the received word and the codeword:
\begin_inset Formula
\begin{equation}
d_{s}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\alpha_{j}\,(1+p_{1,\,j}).\label{eq:soft_distance}
d_{s}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\alpha_{j}\,(1+p_{1,\, j}).\label{eq:soft_distance}
\end{equation}
\end_inset
@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ Here
\end_inset
if the received symbol and codeword symbol are different, and
\begin_inset Formula $p_{1,\,j}$
\begin_inset Formula $p_{1,\, j}$
\end_inset
is the fractional power associated with received symbol
@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ In practice we find that
\begin_layout Standard
\begin_inset Formula
\begin{equation}
u=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}S(c_{j},\,j).\label{eq:u-metric}
u=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}S(c_{j},\, j).\label{eq:u-metric}
\end{equation}
\end_inset
@ -1010,11 +1010,11 @@ Here the
bins containing noise only.
Thus, if the spectral array
\begin_inset Formula $S(i,\,j)$
\begin_inset Formula $S(i,\, j)$
\end_inset
has been normalized so that its median value (essentially the average noise
level) is unity,
has been normalized so that the average value of the noise-only bins is
unity,
\begin_inset Formula $u$
\end_inset
@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ For each received symbol, define the erasure probability as 1.3 times the
a priori
\emph default
symbol-error probability determined from soft-symbol information
\begin_inset Formula $\{p_{1}\textrm{-rank},\,p_{2}/p_{1}\}$
\begin_inset Formula $\{p_{1}\textrm{-rank},\, p_{2}/p_{1}\}$
\end_inset
.
@ -1816,7 +1816,8 @@ reference "fig:N_vs_X"
\begin_inset Formula $X\le25$
\end_inset
because all such words are successfully decoded by the BM algorithm.
because all such words are successfully decoded by a single run of the
errors-only BM algorithm.
Figure
\begin_inset CommandInset ref
LatexCommand ref
@ -1930,7 +1931,7 @@ It is interesting to note that while Rayleigh fading severely degrades the
success rate of the BM decoder, the penalties are much smaller with both
FT and hinted decoding.
Simulated Doppler spreads of 0.2 Hz actually increased the FT and DS decoding
rates slightly at SNRs close to the decosing threshold, presumably because
rates slightly at SNRs close to the decoding threshold, presumably because
with the low-rate JT65 code signal peaks can be enough to produce good
copy.
\end_layout