mirror of
https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git
synced 2024-11-21 03:21:58 -05:00
Description file updates
This commit is contained in:
parent
76620d3e32
commit
c829bcfe27
6
README
6
README
@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2001 - 2021 by Joe Taylor, K1JT.
|
||||
|
||||
WSJT-X Version 2.3 offers ten different protocols or modes: FT4, FT8,
|
||||
JT4, JT9, JT65, Q65, FST4, MSK144, WSPR, FST4W, and Echo. The first
|
||||
seven are designed for making reliable QSOs under weak-signal
|
||||
WSJT-X Version 2.5 offers eleven different protocols or modes: FT4,
|
||||
FT8, JT4, JT9, JT65, Q65, FST4, MSK144, WSPR, FST4W, and Echo. The
|
||||
first seven are designed for making reliable QSOs under weak-signal
|
||||
conditions. They use nearly identical message structure and source
|
||||
encoding. JT65 and Q65 were designed for EME (“moonbounce”), but not
|
||||
limited to just that propagation path, on the VHF/UHF bands and JT65
|
||||
|
@ -4,41 +4,50 @@ the program name stand for `(W)eak (S)ignal communication by K1(JT),`
|
||||
while the suffix `-X` indicates that WSJT-X started as an extended and
|
||||
experimental branch of the program WSJT.
|
||||
.
|
||||
WSJT-X Version 2.0 offers twelve different protocols or modes: FST4,
|
||||
FST4W, FT4, FT8, JT4, JT9, JT65, QRA64, ISCAT, MSK144, WSPR, and Echo.
|
||||
The first eight are designed for making reliable QSOs under extreme
|
||||
weak-signal conditions. They use nearly identical message structure
|
||||
and source encoding. JT65 and QRA64 were designed for EME
|
||||
(`moonbounce`) on the VHF/UHF bands and have also proven very
|
||||
effective for worldwide QRP communication on the HF bands. QRA64 has
|
||||
a number of advantages over JT65, including better performance on the
|
||||
very weakest signals. We imagine that over time it may replace JT65
|
||||
for EME use. JT9 was originally designed for the LF, MF, and lower HF
|
||||
bands. Its submode JT9A is 2 dB more sensitive than JT65 while using
|
||||
less than 10% of the bandwidth. FST4, and its quasi-beacon companion
|
||||
mode FST4W (see below), are designed for LF and MF and offer
|
||||
significant advantages over JT9 and WSPR on those bands. JT4 offers a
|
||||
wide variety of tone spacings and has proven highly effective for EME
|
||||
on microwave bands up to 24 GHz. These four `slow` modes use
|
||||
one-minute timed sequences of alternating transmission and reception,
|
||||
so a minimal QSO takes four to six minutes — two or three
|
||||
transmissions by each station, one sending in odd UTC minutes and the
|
||||
other even. FT8 is operationally similar but four times faster
|
||||
(15-second T/R sequences) and less sensitive by a few dB. On the HF
|
||||
bands, world-wide QSOs are possible with any of these modes using
|
||||
power levels of a few watts (or even milliwatts) and compromise
|
||||
antennas. On VHF bands and higher, QSOs are possible (by EME and
|
||||
other propagation types) at signal levels 10 to 15 dB below those
|
||||
required for CW.
|
||||
WSJT-X Version 2.5 offers eleven different protocols or modes: FT4,
|
||||
FT8, JT4, JT9, JT65, Q65, FST4, MSK144, WSPR, FST4W, and Echo. The
|
||||
first seven are designed for making reliable QSOs under weak-signal
|
||||
conditions. They use nearly identical message structure and source
|
||||
encoding. JT65 and Q65 were designed for EME (“moonbounce”), but not
|
||||
limited to just that propagation path, on the VHF/UHF bands and JT65
|
||||
has also proven very effective for worldwide QRP communication on the
|
||||
HF bands. Q65 has a number of advantages over JT65, including better
|
||||
performance on the very weakest signals and variants with different
|
||||
T/R period lengths. We imagine that over time it may replace JT65 for
|
||||
EME use, it has also proved to be very effective for iono-scatter
|
||||
paths on 6m. JT9 was originally designed for the LF, MF, and lower HF
|
||||
bands. Its submode JT9A is 2 dB more sensitive than JT65 while using
|
||||
less than 10% of the bandwidth. JT4 offers a wide variety of tone
|
||||
spacings and has proven highly effective for EME on microwave bands up
|
||||
to 24 GHz. These four “slow” modes use one-minute timed sequences of
|
||||
alternating transmission and reception, so a minimal QSO takes four to
|
||||
six minutes — two or three transmissions by each station, one sending
|
||||
in odd UTC minutes and the other even. FT8 is operationally similar
|
||||
but four times faster (15-second T/R sequences) and less sensitive by
|
||||
a few dB. FT4 is faster still (7.5 s T/R sequences) and especially
|
||||
well suited for radio contesting. On the HF bands, world-wide QSOs are
|
||||
possible with any of these modes using power levels of a few watts (or
|
||||
even milliwatts) and compromise antennas. QSOs are possible at signal
|
||||
levels 10 to 15 dB below those required for CW. FST4 has similarities
|
||||
in use to JT9 but offers more flexibility as it offers different
|
||||
period lengths allowing QSO completion time to be traded off against
|
||||
sensitivity. In its base form of FST4-60A it has better sensitivity
|
||||
than JT9A and should be considered as an upgrade where JT9 has been
|
||||
the preferred slow QSO mode.
|
||||
.
|
||||
ISCAT, MSK144, and optionally submodes JT9E-H are `fast` protocols
|
||||
designed to take advantage of brief signal enhancements from ionized
|
||||
meteor trails, aircraft scatter, and other types of scatter
|
||||
Note that even though their T/R sequences are short, FT4 and FT8 are
|
||||
classified as slow modes because their message frames are sent only
|
||||
once per transmission. All fast modes in WSJT-X send their message
|
||||
frames repeatedly, as many times as will fit into the Tx sequence
|
||||
length.
|
||||
.
|
||||
MSK144, and optionally submodes JT9E-H are `fast` protocols designed
|
||||
to take advantage of brief signal enhancements from ionized meteor
|
||||
trails, aircraft scatter, and other types of scatter
|
||||
propagation. These modes use timed sequences of 5, 10, 15, or 30 s
|
||||
duration. User messages are transmitted repeatedly at high rate (up
|
||||
to 250 characters per second, for MSK144) to make good use of the
|
||||
shortest meteor-trail reflections or `pings`. ISCAT uses free-form
|
||||
messages up to 28 characters long, while MSK144 uses the same
|
||||
shortest meteor-trail reflections or `pings`. MSK144 uses the same
|
||||
structured messages as the slow modes and optionally an abbreviated
|
||||
format with hashed callsigns.
|
||||
.
|
||||
@ -54,6 +63,11 @@ archival storage, and many other features. WSPR has a new companion
|
||||
FST4W which has a similar message content but offers up to 30 minute
|
||||
transmission periods for greater sensitivity on LF and MF.
|
||||
.
|
||||
FST4W, like WSPR, is a quasi-beacon mode, it targets LF and MF bands
|
||||
and offers a number of T/R periods form 2 minutes up to 30 minutes for
|
||||
the most challenging weak signal paths. Similarly to WSPR reception
|
||||
reports can be automatically uploaded to the WSPRnet.org web service.
|
||||
.
|
||||
Echo mode allows you to detect and measure your own station's echoes
|
||||
from the moon, even if they are far below the audible threshold.
|
||||
.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user