Squashed in this commit:
Author: TheScarastic <warabhishek@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 12 13:29:07 2021 +0200
sm6150-common: fingerprint: Rename fod extension to udfps extension
Author: Vincent Vidal <vinvidal@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:42:49 2020 +0200
sm6150-common: fod: Use FOD_PRESSED_LAYER_ZORDER instead of magic number
Author: Vincent Vidal <vinvidal@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:40:50 2020 +0200
sm6150-common: fod: Include generated_kernel_headers to build libfod_extension
Change-Id: I51fb56c0a20e3cac83afb46ed6a6e2f967159d18
onFingerUp is not called when the finger is kept at the fod area
after it was accepted, which leads to cases where fod_status stays
enabled.
Change-Id: I95da8e12d5cac83dafdfcca286fb4145396a154b
hardware/fingerprint.h is imported from android-12.0.0_r1.
The xiaomi fingerprint extension command was added to the
fingerprint_device struct and it was clang-formatted.
Change-Id: I5c5f876eb47a558059a2423ca5f6cc75afaf3e1d
* These are only needed in case we want to
advertise interfaces with different version
than the HAL definition itself (see DRM).
Change-Id: I3a5c367730ef79ed6260b2d7142bb6ca9eaa4a92
While Google found that fingerprint HAL is insensitive to
increased CPU throughput, we have not found that to be the
case. Allowing more CPUs makes fingerprint unlock up to
2x faster in some tests.
SM8250 device with fingerprint on display:
- Before: 3128ms
- After: 944ms
SDM845 device with fingerprint on the power button:
- Before: 1146ms
- After: 688ms
This reverts commit d0fdb4431d26e4f257b8867f67ffd9b4a9818d9e (d0fdb4431d).
Change-Id: I7a28d82caee2b8503b974a8226b29240eb072ceb
